Page 66 - IJB-9-6
P. 66

International Journal of Bioprinting                              3D Aerosol Jet® printing for microstructuring



            1. Introduction                                    from 70,000 to a half million of euros, and the printing
                                                               on objects with 3 or 5 axes over an usual area of 20 × 30 ×
            Microfabrication processes for high aspect ratio (AR) three-  20 mm . Side backs of this technology are intrinsic in
                                                                     [20]
            dimensional (3D) structures have been widely investigated   the  complex  aerosol  dynamics,  which  occur  across  the
            since the beginning of the 21st century. In particular, the   printing process, often resulting in a poor process control
            microforming process aims to produce semi-planar or 3D   and repeatability. However, process optimizations have
                                                      [1]
            structures from nanometers to sub-millimeters scales . As   been investigated both from an industrial and academic
                               [2]
            reported by Vaezi et al. , many traditional and state-of-  perception, especially encouraging its use in the last
            the-art processes are currently accessible from subtractive   decade.  Two-dimensional  (2D)  applications  have  been
            lithography-based, additive manufacturing (AM)-based,   extensively reviewed mainly for PE, such as conformal
            and hybrid-based approaches. The range of applications   printing, antennas, batteries, smart packaging, wearable
            is in continuous expansion, ranging from electronics and   devices, and (stretchable) sensors [22-25] . Despite an
            life science to aerospace and automotive. In particular, 3D   increasing interest in research and several emerging
            periodic microstructures, such as arrays of pillars or lattice   applications in bioelectronics , surface structuring, and
                                                                                       [26]
            units, with well-defined geometrical characteristics (aspect   biological interfaces , the exploitation of this technology
                                                                               [27]
            ratio [AR], diameter, height, and interspacing), have   as a 3D printing technique is still very limited, and only a
            been efficiently used for microelectromechanical systems   couple of examples have been reported in the literature.
            (MEMS) , energy harvesting 3D microbatteries [4,5] ,   This is mainly related to the fact that this technology was
                   [3]
                                [6]
            bioinspired architectures , microsensors (electrochemical   developed for planar-printed electronics and only a few
            sensing , microactuators ), micro-optical devices ,   studies have investigated the actual possibility to use it for
                                 [8]
                                                        [9]
                  [7]
            circuit packaging , among others . In life science, 3D   3D printing as well.
                          [10]
                                        [11]
            periodic microstructures have also been embedded in
                                                                            [28]
            bacterial  sensors ,  scaffold-based  cell  culture  systems   Saleh  et al.  were the first to AJ®-print silver
                          [12]
            for guiding and cell growth [13-17] , electrophysiological   nanoparticles (AgNPs)-based fully dense truss elements,
            recording sensors , and microbial electrolytic cell .  like  lattices and micropillars  arrays at high ARs ~ 20.
                          [18]
                                                    [19]
                                                               Zips  et al.   also  AJ®-printed  a  composite  of  poly(3,4-
                                                                        [29]
               In the case of AM, 3D structures are produced   ethylenedioxythiophene)  polystyrene   sulfonate
            by direct printing through a functional (multi)-   (PEDOT:PSS) and multiwalled carbon nanotube ink with
            material deposition process. AM methods to fabricate   an AR ~ 3.3. Finally, Hohnholz et al., Di Novo et al., and
            3D   nano/microstructures  have  been  extensively  Vlnieska et al. explored the use of photo-reactive polymers,
            reported in the literature, including two-photon   such  as  polydimethylsiloxane  (PDMS)  and  ultraviolet
            polymerization, (superfine) inkjet printing (IJP),   (UV)-curable adhesives or epoxies to obtain 3D-printed
            stereolithography, syringe extrusion printing, etc. [20,21] .    structure with AJP [30-32] . In each case, the ink formulation
            Among AM techniques, Aerosol Jet® printing (AJ®P) was   and print parameters were controlled and adapted for the
            introduced in the early 1990s by Optomec© Inc. (USA),   specific application. However, these works are dictated
            mainly for printed electronics (PE) applications on free-  by trial-and-error explorations and they lack a thorough
            form (e.g., flat/curved, rigid/flexible) substrates. AJ®P   investigation on 3D AJ®P capabilities and limitations,
            is a noncontact, maskless, direct writing (DW) material   associated with different inks formulations.
            jet-based technology which, differently from the others
            previously mentioned, enables the deposition of (multi-)  This paper aims at fulfilling this research gap with
            functional materials in the form of an aerosol through a   the purpose of identifying guidelines for AJ®P of 3D
            nozzle at a variable stand-off distance, z [1–5] mm, from   microstructures  of  increasing  complexity,  with  respect
            the substrate. The result is a well-defined printed pattern,   to materials and print strategies. Three inks, among
            with a minimum feature size starting from 15 µm up to a   which Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids, that
            few cm in width and 0.1 µm in thickness. A high variety   drastically differentiate in ink composition and application
            of ink viscosities in the range of 1–1000 mPas can be   functionality (electronics, bioelectronics, and biological
            AJ®-printed, from low (ultrasonic configuration) to high   interfaces) and three print strategies were selected and
            (pneumatic configuration) viscous solutions, without the   combined in this study to realize 3D-printed structures of
            use of photo-sensitive materials. Although limited AJ®P   different complexity and aspect ratios.
            ink formulations are available in the market, most of the   This work is the first to provide a systematic discussion
            IJP inks can be AJ®-printed if aerosolized, showing less   on 3D AJ®P capabilities for different ink compositions and
            clogging occurrences. Moreover, compared to laser-based   print strategies, and it highlights the ability of AJ®P as a 3D
            AM techniques, AJ®P offers a relatively high process speed   microfabrication technology, emphasizing its future use
            up to 12 m/min, flexible solutions with start-up costs   for 3D micromanufacturing, electronics, and life science.

            Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023)                         58                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0257
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71