Page 78 - IJOCTA-15-3
P. 78

C. D’Apice et .al. / IJOCTA, Vol.15, No.3, pp.449-463 (2025)
                         ∗
                    Ω j , f | , are defined as                the segmentation problem (consult the model
                          Ω j
                                                              of Mumford-Shah  11  or the approaches proposed
                                     1  Z                       12–19
                 ∗
               |f |  (x) = ⟨f⟩  :=         f(s) ds,           by      along with the others). We refer to the
                  Ω j        Ω j   |Ω j |                                 17
                                         Ω j                  recent study  for an overview of the state of the
                                  ∀ j = 1, . . . , K, ∀ x ∈ Ω j ,  art in this topic.
                    and the 1-D Hausdorff measure of the set      To sort out these issues, we involve an
                    S K
                     j=1  ∂Ω j should be as small as possible.  anisotropic specification of the standard active
                                                              contour model. Apparently, the latter was first
            Hereinafter,  the decomposition of Ω satis-
                                                              introduced in 20  to transform the image segmen-
            fying properties (a)–(d) is denoted with f-
                                                              tation problem into a minimization problem in a
            decomposition.
                                                              suitable functional space, and it offered a fresh
                The role of the function f : Ω → R is
                                                              perspective on image segmentation, which was
            explained by pointing out that after the f-
            decomposition the new objects {Ω j } K   should   referred to as the focus and hot spot of analy-
                                                 j=1          sis in. 21  The subject of image segmentation has
            have homogeneous values of f (see 2,3 ). To char-  seen the proposal of numerous good algorithms
            acterize a measure of the variability of f in each  based on active contour models in recent years
            subdomain Ω j , one can calculate the coefficient  (we recommend that readers consult the latest
            of variation, that is, it is the ratio of the stan-  publications 22–28  and the bibliography therein).
            dard deviation of f(x) within Ω j to its mean     However, their correct application to the NDVI-
            ⟨f⟩ . Furthermore, if we consider applications    decomposition of agricultural fields remains an
               Ω j
            in agriculture it might be reasonable to regard   open problem nowadays.
            the NDVI-characteristic as the primary feature
                                                                  The main idea, that was realized in the
            of the zone of interest Ω, that is, in this case,
                                                              new setting of variational issue for the f-
            f(x) = NDVI(x) for all x ∈ Ω.       However, a
                                                              decomposition, is that we associate with a given
            thorough analysis of this issue shows that it is
            a difficult task to understand NDVI characteris-  objective function f : Ω → R the constrained op-
            tics quantitatively over Ω. By presuming that the  timization problem as follows:
            vegetation data generated from the NDVI is uni-     J(c, φ) = T(c, φ)
            formly and smoothly distributed within the spe-
                                                                           m Z
            cific crop fields, numerous studies have restricted        + α  X    |M Dχ          | → inf , (1)
                                                                                    f
            this interpretation. 4,5  If they attempt to use the               Ω        {φ(x)>l j }  φ∈Ξ
                                                                           j=1
            NDVI on heterogeneous canopies, for example,                 m+1
            plantations that have weeds, mixed soil, and vari-  where T : R   × BV (Ω) → R is a fidelity term,
                                                              {l 0 , l 1 , . . . , l m+1 } is a given collection of distinct
            ous crop mixtures where the vegetation has vary-
                                                              level values, χ       is the characteristic func-
            ing NDVI characteristics because of spatial vari-               {φ(x)>l j }
            ability, this assumption is violated.             tion of the set {x ∈ Ω : φ(x) > l j }, and the
                                                              set of feasible solutions Ξ is defined as follows:
                Accordingly, the data acquired in this man-                                    m+1
                                                              (c, φ) ∈ Ξ if and only if (c, φ) ∈ R  × BV (Ω)
            ner is a valuable source of information that may
                                                              and
            be applied to the management of environmental
            resources. 6,7  Specifically, it enables us to deter-       l 0 ≤ φ(x) ≤ l m+1 a.e. in Ω,
            mine the crop’s health and find out whether there     c = (c 0 , c 1 , . . . , c m ), c j ≥ 0, j = 0, . . . , m.
            are trouble spots within the designated fields or                                     f
            areas where the crops require nutrients or water.  As for the matrix-value function M (·) : Ω →
                                                              R 2×2 , it is the so-called anisotropic diffusion ten-
            A similar point of view is recommended as crucial
            in. 3,6  Some methods for assessing such charac-  sor that avoids the emergence of subdomains with
            teristics have recently been proposed in. 8–10  The  f discontinuity zones or locations where this func-
                                                              tion has a tendency to change quickly.
            most stringent barrier to creating such a decom-
            position, however, is that these subdomains can-      Thus, the main idea, which we push forward,
            not include even minor portions of various fields  is that the segmentation problem should be given
            with plausibly distinct crops, nor should they    as a constrained minimization problem with a
            overlap or contain any fragments of field borders.  special anisotropic cost functional, where the “ef-
            Because of this, the segmentation challenge indi-  fect of anisotropy”we associate with the structure
                                                                                           29
            cated above is fairly difficult.                  topology of f-distribution (see ). With that in
                Moreover, the principal distinguishing char-  mind, we utilize the main characteristic of the
            acteristic of f-decomposition is the impossibil-  given function f — the normal unit vector field
                                                                          2
            ity to reduce it to the well-known settings of    θ : Ω → R to level sets of f.      As a result,
                                                           450
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83