Page 15 - JCAU-6-2

Journal of Chinese
Architecture and Urbanism Leisure-time physical activity

Table 1. (Continued)
First Study City Sample Age Sociodemographic Built environment: LTPA outcomes: Psychosocial
author, (n) range or other factors assessment, factors assessment, factors
year (years) condition studied
and cycling facilities,
esthetics, traffic safety, and
crime safety
Wu et al., Cross Nanjing 399 ≥60 Self-reported; (i) Self-report through Self-report through
2019 -sectional gender, age, NEWS; the Physical Activity
highest educational (ii) Access to facilities, Scale for the Elderly
level, average community safety, (PASE) questionnaire;
monthly income, esthetics, residential recreational physical
chronic disease, suitability, and traffic activity
self-assessment of safety
health, and living
situation
Li et al., Cross Tianjin 851 18 – 65 Self-reported; gender, (i) Objective through GIS; Self-report through
2022 -sectional age, education level, (ii) Road connectivity, facility IPAQ-long; LTW and
income situation, convenience OLTPA
marital status, health (iii) Perceived through
status, psychological HRNet;
stress, organizational (iv) Environmental comfort,
influence, and activity environmental safety
accompaniment
Zhu et al., Cross Guangzhou 991 ≥18 Self-reported; gender, (i) Objective through GIS; Self-report through Self-reported;
2022 -sectional age, education level, (ii) Greening rate, distance to IPAQ; LTPA social support
income situation, the nearest park square,
marital status, park square coverage, and
occupation, and number of fitness facilities
social support
Yin-Juan Cross Qingdao, 3789 25 – 65 Self-reported; gender, (i) Self-report through Self-report through
et al., 2020 -sectional Hangzhou, age, education level, NEWS-A; IPAQ-long; LTW and
Suzhou, income situation, (ii) Residential density, land LTPA
Chengdu occupation, marital use mix diversity, access
status, per capita to commercial places,
living space, per physical activity places
capita disposal annual and public services, street
income, number of connectivity, walking and
family members, and cycling facilities, esthetics,
cities traffic safety, and crime
safety
Dai et al., Cross Guangzhou 776 ≥18 Self-reported; gender, (i) Objective through GIS; Self-report through
2019 -sectional age, education level, (ii) Community greening IPAQ-long; LTPA
income situation, coverage, neighborhood
occupation, and green coverage, distance
community type to the nearest park square,
and number of fitness
facilities
Fu et al., Cross Shenzhen 986 18 – 69 Self-reported; gender, (i) Self-report through Self-report through
2018 -sectional age, education level, NEWS-A; IPAQ-long; LTW and
and occupation (ii) Supporting facilities, road OLTPA
conditions, environmental
beautification, traffic
conditions, access to
exercise facilities, and
security situation

(Cont’d...)

Volume 6 Issue 2 (2024) 6 https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.2427