Page 35 - MSAM-1-2
P. 35

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                     Intense pulsed light sintering of conductive film



                          A                                  B
















                                                             [40]
            Figure 1. (A) Aerosol jet printing system (Reprinted with permission from . Copyright (2019) American Chemical Society. (B) Intense pulsed light
            system.
            process. In this work, electrical property and the degree of   described by the surface roughness parameters. It should
            delamination are the two main optimization objectives.   be noted that different surface roughness parameters are
            As such, electrical property characterization and surface   often used to describe different types of defects or surface
            roughness characterization were conducted to provide   anomaly. For instance, R  measures the average deviation of
                                                                                  a
            information about the sheet resistance and the degree of   the surface over a sampling area (Figure 2A), R  measures
                                                                                                     z
            delamination of the sintered film, respectively.   the maximum deviation of the surface over a sampling area
              The  electrical  property  was  measured  using  a  Lucas   (Figure 2B), and R  measures the fourth power of the root
                                                                              ku
            Labs Pro 4 collinear probe station with a Keithley 2400   mean square deviation to display the dimensionless fourth
            source meter unit. The measurements were done with the   power of the sampling area (Figure 2C).
            collinear probes placed at the center of each printed circular   Each of these roughness parameters has its pros and cons
            film. In this work, sheet resistance was used to characterize   in terms of describing the severity of the delamination. For
            the electrical property of the sintered film for a few reasons.   example, R  is useful for describing the overall severity of
                                                                        a
            First, it is almost impossible to calculate the resistivity of the   the delamination but difficult to pick up small or localized
            sintered film with swelling and delamination morphology   delamination, whereas R  is useful for describing localized
                                                                                   z
            as the cross section of the film cannot be determined   out-of-plane delamination but tend to overestimate the
            accurately using the equation  ρ = RA/L (R: resistance,   delamination severity of localized defects in relation to the
            A: cross-sectional area, and  L: length) due to the non-  overall surface condition. R , on the other hand, is useful
                                                                                     ku
            uniform cross-sectional area . Second, as IPL sintering   for differentiating different defect morphologies. As the
                                   [32]
            usually results in non-uniform sintering across the depth,   delamination of the sintered film can happen in various
            sheet resistance was used in this study instead of electrical   ways, it is vital to use different surface roughness parameters
            resistivity because sheet resistance is more meaningful in   such as R , R , and R  to account for the different modes
                                                                                ku
                                                                         z
                                                                       a
            terms of reflecting the actual electrical property of the IPL-  of delamination. However, for the ease of the optimization
            sintered films with different thicknesses. Furthermore, this   process and analysis, a single surface roughness indicator
            allows electrical circuit designers and engineers to easily   is preferred over many different surface roughness
            determine the number of print passes without the need for   parameters. As such, we have adopted a surface roughness
            quantifying the film thickness.                    indicator,  S, as a linear sum of the normalized surface
              The surface roughness characterization was performed   roughness parameters multiplied by their assigned weights.
            using a Keyence VK-X200 confocal microscope coupled   In this case, we defined the surface roughness indicator,
                                                                           
                                                                     
                                                                                 
            with a ×10 magnification lens. The region of interest   S = w R a  + w R z  +  3  ku  with   0 <<1,S  w 1 + w 2  + w R  w 3  =1.
                                                                          2
                                                                    1
            was  selected  to  be  at  the  center  of  the  circular  film.  As   Each  surface  roughness  parameter  was  normalized
            the dimensions of a single scan region is approximately   with the  highest values of respective surface roughness
            1500 µm × 1000 µm, this can result in biased and selective   parameters (R a,max   = 25.6  µm, R x,max   = 370.1  µm,
            sampling. To avoid this, a large scanning region was created   R ku,max   =  172.0 µm) within the sample populations, and
            by stitching nine different scan regions. This resulted in a   the weights for each surface parameter are the same
            scanned region with a dimension of 4500 µm × 3000 µm,   (w  =  w   = w =1/3) to ensure equal contributions to the
                                                                           3
                                                                      2
                                                                 1
            which can better reflect the overall surface condition over   surface roughness indicator, S. To illustrate the correlation
            the sintered film. The severity of the delamination can be   between the adopted surface roughness indicator and the
            Volume 1 Issue 2 (2022)                         4                      http://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i2.10
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40