Page 105 - MSAM-2-3
P. 105

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                        Validation of a novel ML model for AM-PSP




            Table 9. Comparison of P-values for AM Ti‑6Al‑4V 2‑point coefficients
            2‑Point coefficient  EB‑PBF   EB‑PBF   LPBFHT   LPBFHT     LPBFNHT      LPBFNHT     DED     DED
                              XY        XZ         XY         XZ          XY          XZ        XY       XZ
            EB-PBF XY          \        0.021     0.046      0.001       0.063       0.005      0.025   0.078
            EB-PBF XZ          \         \        0.591      0.019       0.170       0.005      0.088   0.378
            LPBFHT XY          \         \          \        0.056       0.130       0.009      0.030   0.826
            LPBFHT XZ          \         \          \          \         0.777       0.241      0.208   0.060
            LPBFNHT XY         \         \          \          \           \         0.377      0.381   0.046
            LPBFNHT XZ         \         \          \          \           \           \        0.020   0.013
            DED XY             \         \          \          \           \           \         \      0.019
            DED XZ             \         \          \          \           \           \         \        \
            Abbreviations: DED: Directed energy deposition; EB-PBF: Electron beam powder bed fusion; LPBF: Laser powder bed fusion.

            A                               B                               C












                     D                                     E












            Figure 10. F-score for different training conditions: (A) MP, (B) MP + EBSD, (C) MP + XRD, (D) MP + SEM, and (E) all feature above.
            Abbreviations: EBSD: Electron backscatter diffraction; MP: Machining parameters; SEM: Scanning electron microscope; XRD: X-ray diffraction.


            5. Conclusion                                      methods were applied to this study to save computational
                                                               cost and time. Finally, the new PSP linkages, which include
            A valid Ti-6Al-4V AM PSP linkage is presented herein.   the most employed Ti-6Al-4V AM technologies (PBF and
            The PSP linkage focuses on connecting the AM Ti-6Al-4V   DED), were established through this study.
            structure information with post-processing machining
            behavior. This PSP linkage covers L-PBF, EB-PBF, and DED   The key findings of this research are as follows:
            Ti-6AL-4V data, which expands the previous research   (i)  Established a validated statistical methodology to
            version and overcomes the application limitation of the   distinguish the microstructure difference among
            previous PBF Ti-6Al-4V PSP linkages.                  different AM processes fabricated Ti-6Al-4V alloys
              To validate the Ti-6Al-4V PSP linkages established   (L-PBF with/without heat treatment, EB-PBF, and
            in the previous research based on the PBF dataset, wire   DED).(ii)   It was shown that due to inherently
            feed plasma-based directed energy deposition Ti-6Al-4V   different grain morphologies across PBF and DED
            materials were applied to evaluate the efficacy of the   processes, the developed ML-based PSP linkages could
            ML-based PSP linkage accuracy. Similar to a prior study ,   be limited if one of the AM process categories (e.g.,
                                                        [7]
            statistical methods were employed to define the properties of   PBF) is used as a training set to predict the material
            the material, and revised feature dimensionality reduction   response, that is, machining behavior of other AM


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023)                         13                      https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.0999
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110