Page 132 - MSAM-2-3
P. 132

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                       Powder alteration caused by L-PBF process



                                                               a dramatic degradation in their morphology: partial
                                                               melting, hard sintering, and agglomerations. The results of
                                                               this experiment had also been confirmed by Sutton et al.
                                                                                                           [10]
                                                               who concluded that heat affects particles located near the
                                                               melt pool (zone 1). Consequently, heat-affected particles
                                                               become irregular in shape and coarser than particle
                                                               coming from unused powder. Recent studies [10,11,22,34,36,38]
                                                               on the effects of reusing powder show that the PSD shifts
                                                               rightward toward large particles after reuse cycles. In
                                                               addition, the proportion of fine particles drops, whereas
                                                               the proportion of bigger particles grows. Consequently, we
                                                               can establish a similarity between the powder alteration
                                                               caused by the proximity of printed parts and reuse cycles;
                                                               the smaller the distance between printed parts, the more
                                                               the powder is altered. Many authors [1,5,25,27]  claim that the
            Figure 16. Cumulative particle-size distribution measured for each zone.  reduction in fine particles minimizes agglomeration effects,
                                                               which improves powder flowability. However, a decrease in
                                                               the smallest particles and the presence of coarser particles
                                                               may be responsible for an increase in the percentage of
                                                               void within the powder bed so that the printed part can be
                                                               impacted by a lack of fusion [5,11] .
                                                               3.3. Results of experiment 3: PSD changes when
                                                               printing lattice structures of different cell sizes
                                                               Figure 4 shows the four lattice cylinders printed with varying
                                                               cell sizes of 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm, and 5 mm. The powder
                                                               samples are extracted from the lattices at the locations
                                                               indicated by the yellow arrows. As mentioned above, and
                                                               to evaluate the repeatability of the measurements, four
                                                               samples of the powder trapped in each lattice structure
                                                               were analyzed.
                                                                 The PSD of the four different lattice cell sizes is not
            Figure  17. Particle-size distribution measured for each zone (first   superposed, as shown in Figure 19. The PSD of powder
            replicate for each zone).
                                                               trapped in the 2-mm-cell lattice shows a lower proportion
                                                               of tiny particles than in the 5-mm-cell lattice. This finding
                                                               is similar to the results of experiment 2, which reported
                                                               a relevant decrease in small particles as the distance of
                                                               spacing between parts was reduced.
                                                                 Changing the cell size of the lattice, as described in
                                                               Table 2, varied the area and volume ratios of the printed lattice
                                                               cylinders. Figure 20 illustrates that increasing the cell size
                                                               from 2 mm to 5 mm decreased the average diameter D-values
                                                               D90, D50, and D10 by 6%, 12%, and 16%, respectively. The
                                                               coefficients of variation on the measurements of the four
                                                               samples for each lattice cell are <3.9%, <3.0%, and <4.2% on
                                                               Dv90, Dv50, and Dv10, respectively.
                                                                 When  printing  the  lattice  cylinders,  the  powder  had
                                                               already been recycled 11  times.  Figure  21 illustrates the
                                                               evolution  of powder  diameter values when  comparing
            Figure 18. D-values for each zone.                 the diameter values of new powder with the diameter



            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023)                         9                       https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.1781
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137