Page 33 - MSAM-3-3
P. 33

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                           Defects in additively fabricated Al6061



               doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.03.004          29.  Katoch  S,  Chauhan  SS,  Kumar  V.  A  review  on  genetic
                                                                  algorithm: Past, present, and future. Multimed Tools Appl.
            23.  Yoon HK. Relationship between aspect ratio and crack
               density in porous-cracked rocks using experimental and   2021;80:8091-126.
               optimization methods. Appl Sci. 2020;10(20):7147.     doi: 10.1007/s11042-020-10139-6
               doi: 10.3390/app10207147                        30.  Gunantara N. A  review of multi-objective optimization:
                                                                  Methods and its applications. Cogent Eng. 2018;5(1):1502242.
            24.  Maamoun AH, Xue YF, Elbestawi MA, Veldhuis SC. The
               effect of selective laser melting process parameters on the      doi: 10.1080/23311916.2018.1502242
               microstructure and mechanical properties of Al6061 and   31.  Zhao R, Chen C, Wang W, et al. On the role of volumetric
               AlSi10Mg alloys. Materials. 2018;12(1):12.
                                                                  energy density in the microstructure and mechanical
               doi: 10.3390/ma12010012                            properties of laser powder bed fusion Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Addit
                                                                  Manuf. 2022;51:102605.
            25.  Al Aridi R, DiNova V, Zhang T,  et al. Characterization
               of defects in additively manufactured materials from      doi: 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2022.102605
               mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A. 2024;898:146390.
                                                               32.  Cao Y, Wei HL, Yang T, Liu TT, Liao WH. Printability
               doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2024.146390                    assessment  with  porosity  and  solidification  cracking
                                                                  susceptibilities for a high strength aluminum alloy during
            26.  Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. Response
               Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization   laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. 2021;46:102103.
               Using Designed Experiments.  United  States:  John  Wiley  &      doi: 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2021.102103
               Sons; 2016.
                                                               33.  Ulbricht A, Altenburg SJ, Sprengel M, et al. Separation of the
            27.  Zhang Z, Liu S, Zhang Y, et al. Optimization of low-power   formation mechanisms of residual stresses in LPBF 316L.
               femtosecond laser trepan drilling by machine learning and   Metals. 2020;10(9):1234.
               a high-throughput multi-objective genetic algorithm. Optics      doi: 10.3390/met10091234
               Laser Technol. 2022;148:107688.
                                                               34.  Zhou L, Hyer H, Thapliyal S,  et al. Process-dependent
               doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107688
                                                                  composition, microstructure, and printability of Al-Zn-Mg
            28.  Vora J, Chaudhari R, Patel C,  et al. Experimental   and Al-Zn-Mg-Sc-Zr alloys manufactured by laser powder
               investigations and Pareto optimization of fiber laser cutting   bed  fusion.  Metal Mater Trans A Phys  Metal Mater Sci.
               process of Ti6Al4V. Metals. 2021;11(9):1461.       2020;51(6):3215-3227.
               doi: 10.3390/met11091461                           doi: 10.1007/S11661-020-05768-3





































            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2024)                         15                             doi: 10.36922/msam.3652
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38