Page 87 - TD-3-1

Tumor Discovery Missense mutations in CXCR1: Impact on stability and function

doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.780284 doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2019.06.004
44. Rodrigues CHM, Myung Y, Pires DEV, Ascher DB. mCSM- 56. Ferreira LG, Dos Santos RN, Oliva G, Andricopulo AD.
PPI2: Predicting the effects of mutations on protein-protein Molecular docking and structure-based drug design
interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W338-W344. strategies. Molecules. 2015;20(7):13384-13421.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz383 doi: 10.3390/molecules200713384
45. Mutlu G, Acı Çİ. SVM-SMO-SGD: A hybrid-parallel 57. Shivakumar D, Williams J, Wu Y, Damm W, Shelley J,
support vector machine algorithm using sequential minimal Sherman W. Prediction of absolute solvation free energies using
optimization with stochastic gradient descent. Parallel molecular dynamics free energy perturbation and the OPLS
Comput. 2022;113:102955. force field. J Chem Theory Comput. 2010;6(5):1509-1519.
doi: 10.1016/j.parco.2022.102955 doi: 10.1021/ct900587b
46. Shihab HA, Gough J, Cooper DN, Day INM, Gaunt TR. 58. Huang Y, Li Z, Hong Q, et al. A stepwise docking molecular
Predicting the functional consequences of cancer-associated dynamics approach for simulating antibody recognition
amino acid substitutions. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(12):1504-1510. with substantial conformational changes. Comput Struct
Biotechnol J. 2022;20:710-720.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt182
doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.01.012
47. Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure
prediction. BMC Bioinformats. 2008;9:40. 59. Hung LH, Guerquin M, Samudrala R. GPU-Q-J, a fast
method for calculating root mean square deviation (RMSD)
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40
after optimal superposition. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:97.
48. Ishimoto N, Park JH, Kawakami K, et al. Structural basis of doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-97
CXC chemokine receptor 1 ligand binding and activation.
Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):4107. 60. Carter P, Andersen CAF, Rost B. DSSPcont: Continuous
secondary structure assignments for proteins. Nucleic Acids
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39799-2
Res. 2003;31(13):3293-3295.
49. Lovell SC, Davis IW, Arendall WB 3 , et al. Structure
rd
validation by Calpha geometry: Phi,psi and Cbeta deviation. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg626
Proteins. 2003;50(3):437-450. 61. Ashkenazy H, Abadi S, Martz E, et al. ConSurf 2016:
An improved methodology to estimate and visualize
doi: 10.1002/prot.10286
evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids
50. Kc DB. Recent advances in sequence-based protein structure Res. 2016;44(W1):W344-W350.
prediction. Brief Bioinform. 2017;18(6):1021-1032.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw408
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbw070
62. Wang Y, Park JH, Lupala CS, et al. Computer aided protein
51. Hollingsworth SA, Dror RO. Molecular Dynamics engineering to enhance the thermo-stability of CXCR1-T4
Simulation for All. Neuron. 2018;99(6):1129-1143. lysozyme complex. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):5317.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.011 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41838-2
52. Muhammed MT, Aki-Yalcin E. Homology modeling in 63. Yang J, Zhang Y. Protein structure and function prediction
drug discovery: Overview, current applications, and future using I-TASSER. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2015;52:5.8.1-
perspectives. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2019;93(1):12-20. 5.8.15.
doi: 10.1111/cbdd.13388 doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0508s52
53. Brooks BR, Brooks CL 3 , Mackerell AD Jr, et al. CHARMM: 64. Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y. I-TASSER: A unified platform
rd
The biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem. for automated protein structure and function prediction.
2009;30(10):1545-1614. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(4):725-738.
doi: 10.1002/jcc.21287 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.5
54. Rasheed MA, Iqbal MN, Saddick S, et al. Identification 65. Sobolev OV, Afonine PV, Moriarty NW, et al. A global
of lead compounds against Scm (fms10) in Enterococcus Ramachandran score identifies protein structures with
faecium using computer aided drug designing. Life (Basel). unlikely stereochemistry. Structure. 2020;28(11):1249-1258.e2.
2021;11(2):77.
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2020.08.005
doi: 10.3390/life11020077
66. Guzzi AF, Oliveira FSL, Amaro MMS, Tavares-Filho PF,
55. Hildebrand PW, Rose AS, Tiemann JKS. Bringing molecular Gabriel JE. In silico prediction of the functional and structural
dynamics simulation data into view. Trends Biochem Sci. consequences of the non-synonymous single nucleotide
2019;44(11):902-913. polymorphism A122V in bovine CXC chemokine receptor

Volume 3 Issue 1 (2024) 23 https://doi.org/10.36922/td.2512