Page 85 - TD-3-1
P. 85
Tumor Discovery Missense mutations in CXCR1: Impact on stability and function
Ethics approval and consent to participate doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.07.005
Not applicable. 10. Park JH, Scheerer P, Hofmann KP, Choe HW, Ernst OP.
Crystal structure of the ligand-free G-protein-coupled
Consent for publication receptor opsin. Nature. 2008;454(7201):183-187.
Not applicable. doi: 10.1038/nature07063
11. Vauquelin G, Van Liefde I. G protein-coupled receptors:
Availability of data A count of 1001 conformations. Fundam Clin Pharmacol.
2005;19(1):45-56.
All datasets generated for this study are available on request
from the corresponding authors. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2005.00319.x
12. Rosenbaum DM, Rasmussen SGF, Kobilka BK. The structure
References and function of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature.
1. Yang D, Zhou Q, Labroska V, et al. G protein-coupled 2009;459(7245):356-363.
receptors: Structure-and function-based drug discovery. doi: 10.1038/nature08144
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):7.
13. Rosenbaum DM, Cherezov V, Hanson MA, et al. GPCR
doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00435-w engineering yields high-resolution structural insights
2. Katritch V, Cherezov V, Stevens RC. Diversity and into beta2-adrenergic receptor function. Science.
modularity of G protein-coupled receptor structures. Trends 2007;318(5854):1266-1273.
Pharmacol Sci. 2012;33(1):17-27. doi: 10.1126/science.1150609
doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2011.09.003 14. Landau EM, Rosenbusch JP. Lipidic cubic phases: A novel
3. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, et al. The protein data concept for the crystallization of membrane proteins. Proc
bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):235-242. Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(25):14532-14535.
doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14532
4. Rajagopalan L, Rajarathnam K. Ligand selectivity and 15. Oldham WM, Hamm HE. Heterotrimeric G protein
affinity of chemokine receptor CXCR1. Role of N-terminal activation by G-protein-coupled receptors. Nat Rev Mol Cell
domain. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(29):30000-30008. Biol. 2008;9(1):60-71.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313883200 doi: 10.1038/nrm2299
5. Holmes WE, Lee J, Kuang WJ, Rice GC, Wood WI. Structure 16. Leong SR, Kabakoff RC, Hébert CA. Complete mutagenesis of
and functional expression of a human interleukin-8 the extracellular domain of interleukin-8 (IL-8) type A receptor
receptor. Science. 1991;253(5025):1278-1280. J Immun. identifies charged residues mediating IL-8 binding and signal
2009;183(5):2895-2897. transduction. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(30):19343-19348.
doi: 10.1126/science.1840701 17. Skelton NJ, Quan C, Reilly D, Lowman H. Structure of
a CXC chemokine-receptor fragment in complex with
6. Ha H, Debnath B, Neamati N. Role of the CXCL8-CXCR1/2 interleukin-8. Structure. 1999;7(2):157-168.
axis in cancer and inflammatory diseases. Theranostics.
2017;7(6):1543-1588. doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80022-7
18. Hébert CA, Vitangcol RV, Baker JB. Scanning mutagenesis
doi: 10.7150/thno.15625
of interleukin-8 identifies a cluster of residues required for
7. Park SH, Das BB, Casagrande F, et al. Structure of the receptor binding. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(28):18989-18994.
chemokine receptor CXCR1 in phospholipid bilayers.
Nature. 2012;491(7426):779-783. 19. Nicholls DJ, Tomkinson NP, Wiley KE, et al. Identification
of a putative intracellular allosteric antagonist binding-site
doi: 10.1038/nature11580 in the CXC chemokine receptors 1 and 2. Mol Pharmacol.
8. Sojka AC, Brennan KM, Maizels ET, Young CD. The 2008;74(5):1193-1202.
science behind g protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and doi: 10.1124/mol.107.044610
their accurate visual representation in scientific research. 20. Han X, Feng Y, Chen X, Gerard C, Boisvert WA.
J Biocommun. 2017;41(1):e6.
Characterization of G protein coupling mediated by the
doi: 10.5210/jbc.v41i1.7309 conserved D134(3.49) of DRY motif, M241(6.34), and
9. Hofmann KP, Scheerer P, Hildebrand PW, et al. A G protein- F251(6.44) residues on human CXCR1. FEBS Open Bio.
coupled receptor at work: The rhodopsin model. Trends 2015;5:182-190.
Biochem Sci. 2009;34(11):540-552. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2015.03.001
Volume 3 Issue 1 (2024) 21 https://doi.org/10.36922/td.2512

