Page 88 - TD-3-1
P. 88

Tumor Discovery                                      Missense mutations in CXCR1: Impact on stability and function



               type 1. Braz J Biol. 2020;80(1):39-46.          73.  Mirzadegan T, Benkö G, Filipek S, Palczewski K. Sequence
               doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.188655                      analyses of G-protein-coupled receptors: Similarities to
                                                                  rhodopsin. Biochemistry. 2003;42(10):2759-2767.
            67.  Kato K, Nakayoshi T, Kurimoto E, Oda A. Mechanisms of
               deamidation of asparagine residues and effects of main-     doi: 10.1021/bi027224+
               chain conformation on activation energy.  Int J Mol Sci.   74.  Rovati GE, Capra V, Neubig RR. The highly conserved DRY
               2020;21(19):7035.                                  motif of class A G protein-coupled receptors: Beyond the
               doi: 10.3390/ijms21197035                          ground state. Mol Pharmacol. 2007;71(4):959-964.
            68.  Chakkalakal SA, Heilig J, Baumann U, Paulsson M,      doi: 10.1124/mol.106.029470
               Zaucke  F. Impact  of  arginine  to  cysteine  mutations  in   75.  Arshad M, Bhatti A, John P. Identification and  in silico
               collagen II on protein secretion and cell survival. Int J Mol   analysis of functional SNPs of human TAGAP protein:
               Sci. 2018;19(2):541.                               A comprehensive study. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0188143.
               doi: 10.3390/ijms19020541
                                                                  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188143
            69.  Ganguly HK, Basu G. Conformational landscape of   76.  Mosaeilhy A, Mohamed MM, Doss CGP, et al. Genotype-
               substituted prolines. Biophys Rev. 2020;12(1):25-39.
                                                                  phenotype correlation in 18 Egyptian patients with glutaric
               doi: 10.1007/s12551-020-00621-8                    acidemia type I. Metab Brain Dis. 2017;32(5):1417-1426.
            70.  Zaki OK, Krishnamoorthy N, El Abd HS, et al. Two patients      doi: 10.1007/s11011-017-0006-4
               with Canavan disease and structural modeling of a novel
               mutation. Metab Brain Dis. 2017;32(1):171-177.  77.  Zhao F, Zheng L, Goncearenco A, Panchenko AR, Li M.
                                                                  Computational approaches to prioritize cancer driver
               doi: 10.1007/s11011-016-9896-9                     missense mutations. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(7):2113.
            71.  Agrahari AK, Kumar A, Siva R, Zayed H, Doss CGP.      doi: 10.3390/ijms19072113
               Substitution impact of highly conserved arginine residue
               at position 75 in GJB1 gene in association with X-linked   78.  Chun S, Fay JC. Identification of deleterious mutations
               Charcot-Marie-tooth disease: A  computational study.   within three human genomes. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1553-
               J Theor Biol. 2018;437:305-317.                    1561.
               doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.10.028                    doi: 10.1101/gr.092619.109.
            72.  Suetomi K, Rojo D, Navarro J. Identification of a signal   79.  Li J, Wei Z, Hakonarson H. Application of computational
               transduction switch in the chemokine receptor CXCR1.   methods in genetic study of inflammatory bowel disease.
               J Biol Chem. 2002;277(35):31563-31566.             World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(3):949-960.
               doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204713200                        doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.949

































            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2024)                         24                         https://doi.org/10.36922/td.2512
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93