Page 48 - TD-4-3
P. 48

Tumor Discovery                                                   HRD genomic alterations in Chinese NSCLC




                         A                                   B




















                         C                                   D

















            Figure 4. The association of HRD status with PD-L1 expression in this cohort and TCGA cohort. (A) Comparison of the number of PD-L1 positive and negative
            cases between the HRD-H (n = 14) and HRD-L (n = 140) groups in NSCLC. The HRD-H group exhibited a significantly higher rate of PD-L1 positive expression
            compared to the HRD-L group. (B) Comparison of the number of PD-L1 positive and negative cases between the HRD-H and HRD-L groups in LUAD. No
            significant correlation was observed between HRD phenotype and PD-L1 expression in LUAD. (C) Comparison of normalized scores of PD-L1 expression between
            the HRD-L (n=321) and HRD-H (n = 31) groups in the TCGA-LUAD dataset. The mean PD-L1 protein expression was significantly higher in the HRD-H group
            compared to the HRD-L group. (D) Comparison of normalized scores of PD-L1 expression between the HRD-L (n = 317) and HRD-H (n = 31) groups in the
            TCGA-LUSC dataset. No significant difference in PD-L1 expression was observed between the HRD-L and HRD-H groups in the TCGA-LUSC dataset.
            Note: *p<0.05, NS denotes not significant.
            Abbreviations: HRD-H: Homologous recombination deficiency-high; HRD-L: Homologous recombination deficiency-low; LUAD: Lung adenocarcinoma;
            LUSC: Lung squamous cell carcinoma; NSCLC: Non-small cell lung cancer; PD-L1: Programmed death-ligand 1; RPPA: Reverse phase protein array;
            TCGA: The Cancer Genome Atlas.
            pathway and release type  I interferons, thus increasing   Although in our LUAD cohort, pre-defined HRD was not
            immune cell infiltration.  This process may upregulate   significantly associated with PD-L1 expression, this does not
                                38
            immune checkpoint molecules, including PD-L1, thereby   rule out the potential for synergy between PARP inhibitors
            increasing tumor immunogenicity. Clinically, this suggests   and ICIs in NSCLC. Previous studies in other solid tumors
            that  HRD-positive tumors could  be  more responsive   have demonstrated that combining PARP inhibitors with
            to ICIs. Recent clinical evidence strongly supports this   ICIs can enhance anti-tumor immune responses, as seen in
            dual  biomarker  approach.  In  the  CheckMate-9LA study,   the MEDIOLA and TOPACIO trials.  Therefore, integrating
                                                                                           40
            patients with both HRD positivity and PD-L1 ≥1% who   HRD status and PD-L1 expression into clinical decision-
            received  nivolumab  plus  ipilimumab  combined  with
            chemotherapy achieved a remarkable 3-year overall   making could help stratify patients: Those with both
            survival rate of 38%, significantly outperforming patients   high HRD scores and elevated PD-L1 expression may be
            positive for only one biomarker.  Therefore, HRD status,   prioritized for combination therapies, while those with only
                                      39
            in combination with PD-L1 expression, could serve as a   one or neither biomarker may be directed toward alternative
            composite biomarker to identify patients most likely to   strategies. This approach could optimize therapeutic
            benefit from immunotherapy or combination regimens.  outcomes and minimize unnecessary toxicity.


            Volume 4 Issue 3 (2025)                         40                           doi: 10.36922/TD025180032
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53