Page 123 - AJWEP-22-5
P. 123

Land–cover change in the Ngerengere River

                or bare areas, while the NDBaI (Equation IV) detects   urban  or  developed  zones.  Bare  land  was  classified
                recently  burned regions by emphasizing  the spectral   as non-vegetated and non-built-up areas, generally
                signature of charred vegetation. The NBR (Equation V)   representing exposed soil or barren terrain. 59,60  This rule-
                further assists in identifying both vegetated  and non-  based  classification  framework  allowed  accurate  and
                vegetated  surfaces, making  it suitable for monitoring   consistent land cover mapping by leveraging the spectral
                burn severity and vegetation health. 1,57,58        characteristics of each land cover type. The integration
                                                                    of spectral indices with logical conditions significantly
                          Green SWIR��                             improved  classification  accuracy,  as  demonstrated  in
                MNDWI                                        (I)
                          Green SWIR��                             recent remote sensing studies. 2,33,61

                                  NIRRed                          2.2.3. Visualization, export, and accuracy assessment
                                       −
                    =
                EVI G                                       (II)  According to previous studies, 1,62   a  pre-defined  color
                         ( NIRC )( RedC )(   Blue L) 
                                                  +
                             + 1      − 2                         palette  was  applied  to  the  classified  land  cover  map
                                                                    to enhance visual interpretation, with each land cover
                         SWIR NIR��                              class assigned a distinct and easily recognizable color.
                NDBI��                                    (III)
                        SWIR NIR��                               Leveraging  the  capabilities  of  GEE  significantly
                                                                    streamlined  the image  processing and visualization
                         SWIR ThermalNIR��   ��                   workflow,  ensuring  efficiency,  consistency,  and
                NDBaI �                                     (IV)   reproducibility  throughout  the analysis. 2,57  The  use of
                         SWIR ThermalNIR��   ��
                                                                    cloud-based platforms, for example, GEE, has proven
                                                                    highly effective for large-scale land cover classification,
                       NIRSWIR��
                NBR�                                         (V)   offering  scalable,  accessible,  and  robust  tools  that
                       NIRSWIR��                                   support researchers and practitioners  in conducting

                  Where, Green = Green band (e.g., Band 3 in Landsat 8);  spatial analysis and environmental  monitoring. 16,54
                    SWIR = Shortwave Infrared band (e.g., Band 6 in   Furthermore,  the  classification  accuracy  of  all  four
                  Landsat 8);                                       images (2004, 2014, 2024, and 2034) in the study was
                  NIR = Near-Infrared (e.g., Band 5 in Landsat 8);  assessed  by  an  error  matrix  using  Google  Earth  and
                                                                    land use maps. Accuracy assessment was essential for
                  Red = Red band (e.g., Band 4);                    evaluating  the  reliability  of  land  cover  classification
                  Blue = Blue band (e.g., Band 2);                  by comparing results with reference data. It involved
                  L = Canopy background adjustment (typically 1);   overall  accuracy, producer’s and user’s accuracy, and
                    C₁,  C₂  =  Coefficients  for  atmospheric  resistance   Kappa statistics. Assessing both classified and predicted
                  (typically C₁ = 6, C₂ = 7.5);                     maps validated the model’s performance and supported
                  G = Gain factor (typically 2.5);                  its use in environmental monitoring, land management,
                    Thermal = Thermal Infrared (e.g., Band 10 or 11 in   and spatial planning. The Kappa coefficient was used to
                  Landsat 8).
                                                                    measure the actual agreement in this validation, beyond
                  The calculated indices were then applied through a   what would be expected by chance. It is widely applied
                rule–based  classification  approach  to  categorize  land   in LULC accuracy assessments to quantify the level of
                cover  types.  Water  bodies  were  identified  in  areas   true agreement. To ensure that even smaller land cover
                where EVI values were <0, indicating low vegetation   classes were represented, a stratified random sampling
                reflectance  typical  of  open  water.  Wetlands  were   approach was adopted during the accuracy assessment.
                detected in non-water pixels where MNDWI was greater   The  overall  accuracy  metric  was calculated  using
                than or equal to −0.2, capturing regions with significant   Equation VI to assess the classification performance of
                moisture  content.  We  classified  vegetation  where   the entire image, while the percentage change in LULC
                NBR values exceeded 0.4, indicating the presence of   was quantified using Equation VII.
                healthy plant cover. Within the vegetation class, dense
                vegetation,  that is,  forests,  were  further  identified  by        ∑  ( Correctly classidied
                NBR values of 0.6 or higher, while sparse vegetation                   pixels)
                or shrubland corresponded to NBR values below 0.6.   Overallaccuracy =
                Built-up  areas  were  distinguished  by  pixels  where                 ∑  ( Total numberoff     (VI)
                NDBI exceeded −0.15 and NDBaI was ≤0.15, signifying                     referencepixels)



                Volume 22 Issue 5 (2025)                       117                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025180137
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128