Page 131 - AJWEP-v22i3
P. 131

Groundwater trends in Karakalpakstan

                requiring pre-whitening or other adjustments, given the   indicating  a general  rise in groundwater levels
                absence of serial correlation that might otherwise bias   throughout the year. Kanlikul Province also exhibits a
                the results.                                        significant  annual  increase  (Z=2.595,  p=0.009), with
                                                                    monthly  increases from  April  to  November, peaking
                3.2. Trend analysis results                         in May (Z=3.651, p<0.001), again indicating seasonal
                                                                    recharge.  In  Kungirot  Province,  a  significant  annual
                3.2.1. MK test                                      increase  (Z=2.846,  p=0.004) is observed, supported
                The MK test results presented in Table 3 and Table S1   by increasing trends from April to October, with the
                provide a comprehensive analysis of monthly and annual   strongest trend in May (Z=3.499,  p<0.001), further
                groundwater level trends across various provinces and   underscoring  seasonal  patterns.  Muynak Province
                the Republic of Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan.  These   exhibits  one of the strongest trends, with a highly
                results reveal significant spatial and temporal variations,   significant  annual  increase  (Z=3.884,  p<0.001) and
                highlighting both consistent patterns and local anomalies.  consistent monthly rises throughout the year. In Nukus
                  In Turtkul Province (Table 3), the MK test reveals   Province, the annual trend is not significant; however,
                predominantly  stable  groundwater  levels  with  no   May shows a significant increase (Z=2.047, p=0.041),
                significant  annual  trend.  However,  statistically   whereas other months do not. Kegeyli Province shows
                significant  decreasing  trends  are  observed  in  January   a significant annual increase (Z=2.668, p=0.008), with
                (Z=−2.270,  p=0.023) and February (Z=−1.973,        monthly  trends indicating  widespread  increases  from
                p=0.048), reflecting a reduction in groundwater levels   May to September, consistent with seasonal recharge.
                during  the  winter  months.  Conversely,  a  significant   In Buzatau Province, both annual (Z=2.879, p=0.004)
                increasing trend in August (Z=2.261, p=0.024) suggests   and monthly trends are positive,  with May showing
                a localized summer increase in groundwater levels. In   the  strongest  increases  (Z=3.106,  p=0.002).  Chimbay
                Ellikkala Province, the annual trend is not statistically   Province  exhibits  significant  positive  trends  annually
                significant.  However,  the  monthly  analysis  indicates   (Z=3.172,  p=0.002) and monthly, especially  in  April
                strong increasing trends from April (Z=4.065, p<0.001)   (Z=3.619, p<0.001), indicating year-round groundwater
                through September, with the most pronounced change   level rises. Karauzyak Province also demonstrates
                occurring  in  April.  This seasonal  pattern  suggests a   significant  positive  annual  (Z=3.172,  p=0.002) and
                consistent rise in groundwater levels during the warmer   monthly  trends, with  particularly  strong  increases
                months, likely influenced by regional hydrological or   from  March  to  October, peaking  in  May (Z=3.324,
                climatic conditions.                                p<0.001).  In  Takhtakopir  Province,  a  significant
                  The results for Beruniy Province (Table S1)       annual  trend (Z=2.254,  p=0.024) is observed, with
                highlight  a  significant  annual  increase  (Z=2.906,   significant  monthly  increases  in  May  and  September,
                p=0.004), with monthly  increases  from  April to   suggesting  localized  seasonal variations.  Finally, for
                November, with the strongest monthly trend in May   the Republic of Karakalpakstan, which aggregates data
                (Z=4.033,  p<0.001), indicating  favorable  seasonal   from all provinces, a significant positive annual trend
                recharge. Similarly,  Amudarya Province (Table S1)   (Z=3.603, p<0.001) is evident. Monthly trends highlight
                displays  a  significant  positive  annual  trend  (Z=2.906,   widespread  increases,  with the  strongest trends from
                p=0.004), with monthly  increases  from  April to   April to  August aligning  with the  seasonal patterns
                November, mirroring the seasonal pattern observed in   observed at the provincial level. Generally, the MK test
                Beruniy and suggesting similar hydrological influences.   results across the province-level seasonal patterns.
                In  Khojeli  Province,  no  significant  annual  trend  is   In summary, the MK test results indicate varied
                observed.  However,  significant  monthly  increases  are   groundwater trends across provinces. While some show
                observed in April, May, and August, reflecting seasonal   no annual trend, most exhibit clear seasonal increases
                groundwater variability.  Takhiatash  Province shows   during the warmer months. These findings underscore
                no  significant  trends  annually  or  in  most  months,   the importance of implementing localized and seasonally
                except for a notable increase in November (Z=−2.205,   adaptive groundwater management strategies in response
                p=0.027), which suggests a late-autumn  increase  in   to these temporal and spatial patterns.
                groundwater levels. For Shumanay Province, both the
                annual trend (Z=3.158,  p=0.002) and monthly trends   3.2.2. IPTA test
                are  significantly  positive,  with  consistent  increases   Insights derived from  Tables  4 and S2, along with
                observed across nearly  all  months except  November,   Figures 2 and S1, reveal detailed hydrometeorological



                Volume 22 Issue 3 (2025)                       125                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025080052
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136