Page 82 - ARNM-2-3
P. 82

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                                    OrthoCT experimental proof of concept



            communication with the computer through the GPIB/
            Ethernet  converter  (GPIB-ENET/100  model,  National
            Instruments, Austin, Texas,  USA).  This  converter  was
            connected to the computer through a local network
            established by a TP-Link TL-WR340G router. For
            the  experimental  measurements  in  a  radiotherapy
            environment, all the NIM and CAMAC electronics
            described here, along with the GPIB/Ethernet converter
            and router, were placed inside the treatment room.
            The acquisition system was controlled from the linear
            accelerator (linac) control room using a laptop computer
            running the Linux OpenSuse 11.3 operating system with   Figure  6. Configuration of the jaws and MLC leaves used during
            custom-made C/C++ routines. A  25-meter Ethernet   irradiation. The field size defined by the MLC and the jaws was
            cable was used to establish the connection with the router   10 mm × 10 mm and 5 mm × 5 mm at the isocenter, respectively. The
            inside the treatment room. The total dead time of the data   junction between the MLC leaves was offset by 100 mm from the center.
                                                               Abbreviation: MLC: Multi-leaf collimator.
            acquisition system was approximately 85%.
              Once the data were collected during the irradiation, the   MLC was positioned to define a field of 10 mm × 10 mm
            corresponding counts spectra were constructed. It should   at the isocenter. Note that the junction between the leaves
            be noted that the information collected by the CAMAC   of the same pair of the MLC had an offset of 100 mm from
            system during irradiation consists of a data vector for   the isocenter, as depicted in the diagram. This arrangement
            each channel of the prototype. Each sample in this vector   of the jaws and the MLC aimed to minimize the impact of
            represents the maximum amplitude value of an event   radiation that escapes through the linac head window and
            detected by that channel. To build the count profiles, we   falls outside the field of interest. The jaws were set to define
            first created a histogram of the values obtained for each   a field size of 5 mm × 5mm at the isocenter.
            of the channels for a given measurement. Each histogram
            was divided into 128 bins, with values ranging from 0 to   Figure 7 displays the time macrostructure of the linac
            2047 (this value was chosen based on the fact that the ADC   beam measured with the prototype and acquired with
            used in the acquisition has a dynamic range of 11 bits).   a PicoScope 2203 oscilloscope (Pico Technology, UK).
            The resulting histogram is then fitted to a Gaussian curve   Examining the persistence  graph obtained from 100
            according to the Equation I:                       waveforms plotted on a time scale that allows two pulses
                                                               to be observed simultaneously (left), the period of the
                   ( x− ) 2                                    macrostructure is 4.85 ms, corresponding to a frequency of
                     µ
            y =  A e×  2 σ 2                            (I)    approximately 206 Hz. From the analysis of a single pulse
              where A, μ, and  represent the amplitude, mean, and   (persistence plot at the middle and average pulse waveform
            standard deviation of the Gaussian curve, respectively. This   at right), it exhibits a fast rise in amplitude (approximately
            procedure was implemented in MATLAB (MathWorks,    0.85  µs), followed by a slower rise (for about 3.25  µs),
            Massachusetts, USA), using the  fminsearch function to   and a sharp decay at around 1.40 µs. After approximately
            calculate the best-fit parameters. The profile value for a   5.5 µs, the event approaches values very close to zero and
            given channel at a certain irradiation position is then given   continues with a gradual decay that persists until around
            by the value of μ, obtained from the Gaussian fit.  10 µs (when the signal returns to the baseline).
            2.3. Linear accelerator                            2.4. Mitigation of the out-of-field radiation effect

            The linac used in this experimental study was the   It is well established that there exists a background flux of
            TrueBeam  (Varian  Medical Systems, Inc.,  Palo Alto,   photons (and other particles) emanating from the linac
            CA, USA) installed in the Radiotherapy Department   head. Studies have been conducted to examine the influence
            of the Coimbra Hospital and University Center. It was   of such out-of-field flux on the development of secondary
            operated at 6MV in flattening filter-free mode with a dose   oncological diseases.  Different types of accelerators yield
                                                                               11
            rate of 800 monitor units per minute (MU/min). A field   varying doses outside the treatment field due to differences
            size of 5 mm × 5 mm at the isocenter was used. This size   in their shielding.  The background radiation escaping
                                                                              12
            was achieved by the combined setting of the jaws and   from the linac head presents technological challenges for
            the multi-leaf collimator (MLC).  Figure  6 illustrates the   orthogonal ray imaging, as it can lead to signal saturation
            configuration used during the irradiation process. The   when penetrating the detector. In addition, this out-of-


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2024)                         5                              doi: 10.36922/arnm.4099
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87