Page 77 - EER-2-3
P. 77

Explora: Environment
            and Resource                                              ZnO and TiO nanoparticles and its impact on chickpeas
                                                                               2

               Technol Innov. 2022;25:102146.                  18.  Sharma P, Chauhan NS. Effect on nanoparticles on plant cell
                                                                  morphology, physiology, and metabolism. In:  The Impact
               doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.102146
                                                                  of Nanoparticles on Agriculture and Soil. United States:
            12.  Chaudhary IJ, Rathore D. Assessment of dose-response   Academic Press; 2023. p. 95-113.
               relationship between ozone dose and groundnut (Arachis
               hypogaea L) cultivars using open top chamber (OTC)   19.  Helal NM, Khattab HI, Emam MM, et al. Improving yield
               and Ethylenediurea (EDU).  Environ Technol Innov.   components and desirable eating quality of two wheat
               2021;22:101494.                                    genotypes using Si and nanoSi particles under heat stress.
                                                                  Plants (Basel). 2022;11(14):1819.
               doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101494
                                                                  doi: 10.3390/plants11141819
            13.  Maclachlan S, Zalik S. Plastid structure, chlorophyll
               concentration, and free amino acid composition of a   20.  Rai-Kalal P, Jajoo A. Priming with zinc oxide nanoparticles
               chlorophyll mutant of barley. Can J Bot. 1963;41(7):1053-1062.  improve germination and photosynthetic performance in
                                                                  wheat. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021;160:341-351.
               doi: 10.1139/b63-088
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.01.032
            14.  Yentsch CS, Duxbury AC. Some of the factors affecting
               the calibration number of the clarke‐bumpus quantitative   21.  Adil M, Bashir S, Bashir S, et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles
               plankton sampler 1. Limnol Oceanogr. 1956;1(4):268-273.  improved chlorophyll contents, physical parameters,
               doi: 10.4319/lo.1956.1.4.0268                      and wheat yield under salt stress.  Front Plant Sci.
                                                                  2022;13:932861.
            15.  Keller T, Schwager H. Air pollution and ascorbic acid. Eur J
               Forest Pathol. 1977;7(6):338-350.                  doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.932861
               doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1977.tb00603.x         22.  Simkin AJ, Kapoor L, Doss CGP, Hofmann TA, Lawson T,
                                                                  Ramamoorthy S. The role of photosynthesis related
            16.  Chandrika KP, Pasala R, Pandey BB, et al. Nanochelation:   pigments in light harvesting, photoprotection and
               An efficient tool in plant nutrition management. In:   enhancement of photosynthetic yield in planta. Photosynth
               Nanofertilizer Delivery, Effects and Application Methods.   Res. 2022;152(1):23-42.
               Netherlands: Elsevier; 2024. p. 15-33.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/s11120-021-00892-6
            17.  Rhaman MS, Tania SS, Imran S, et al. Seed priming with
               nanoparticles: An emerging technique for improving plant   23.  Akram NA, Shafiq F, Ashraf M. Ascorbic acid-a potential
               growth, development, and abiotic stress tolerance. J Soil Sci   oxidant scavenger and its role in plant development and
               Plant Nutr. 2022;22(4):4047-4062.                  abiotic stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:613.
               doi: 10.1007/s42729-022-01007-3                    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00613



































            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025)                         10                          doi: 10.36922/EER025120024
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82