Page 83 - IJAMD-2-3

International Journal of AI for
Materials and Design Optimization of membrane shrinkage and stability

Springer; 2009. Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference; 2008.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-101-1_2 doi: 10.1109/WSC.2008.4736059
26. Su X, Yan X, Tsai CL. Linear regression. Wiley Interdiscip Rev 36. Kroese DP, Rubinstein RY. Monte carlo methods. Wiley
Comput Stat. 2012;4(3):275-294. Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2012;4(1):48-58.
doi: 10.1002/wics.1198 doi: 10.3390/nano15020117
27. Mosca E, Szigeti F, Tragianni S, Gallagher D, Groh G. 37. Kroese DP, Brereton T, Taimre T, et al. Why the Monte Carlo
SHAP-based explanation methods: A review for NLP method is so important today. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput
interpretability. In: Proceedings of the 29 International Stat. 2014;6(6):386-392.
th
Conference on Computational Linguistics; 2022.
doi: 10.1002/wics.1314
doi: 2022.coling-1.406
38. Gao H, He W, Zhao YB, Opris DM, Xu G, Wang J. Electret
28. Antwarg L, Miller R M, Shapira B, Rokach L. Explaining mechanisms and kinetics of electrospun nanofiber
anomalies detected by autoencoders using Shapley Additive membranes and lifetime in filtration applications in
Explanations. Expert Syst Appl. 2021;186:115736. comparison with corona charged membranes. J Membr Sci.
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115736 2020;600:117879.
29. Van den Broeck G, Lykov A, Schleich M, Suciu D. On doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.117879
the tractability of SHAP explanations. J Artif Intell Res. 39. Tong HW, Wang M. Electrospinning of fibrous polymer
2022;74:851-886. scaffolds using positive voltage or negative voltage:
doi: 10.1613/jair.1.13283 A comparative study. Biomed Mater. 2010;5(5):054110.
30. Li Z. Extracting spatial effects from machine learning model doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/5/5/054110
using local interpretation method: An example of SHAP and 40. Liao Y, Wang R, Tian M, Qiu C, Fane AG. Fabrication of
XGBoost. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 2022;96:101845. polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) nanofiber membranes by
doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101845 electro spinning for direct contact membrane distillation.
J Membr Sci. 2013;425:30-39.
31. Zhang J, Ma X, Zhang J, et al. Insights into geospatial
heterogeneity of landslide susceptibility based on the SHAP doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.023
XGBoost model. J Environ Manag. 2023;332:117357. 41. Mi HY, Jing X, Jacques BR, Turng LS, Peng XF.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117357 Characterization and properties of electrospun
thermoplastic polyurethane blend fibers: Effect of solution
32. Wang H, Liang Q, Hancock JT, Khoshgoftaar TM. Feature rheological properties on fiber formation. J Mater Res.
selection strategies: A comparative analysis of SHAP value 2013;28(17):2339-2350.
and importance based methods. J Big Data. 2024;11(1):44.
doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.023
doi: 10.1186/s40537-024-00905-w
42. Lem KW, Haw JR, Curran S, et al. Effect of hard segment
33. Harrison RL. Introduction to monte carlo simulation. AIP molecular weight on dilute solution properties of ether based
Conf Proc. 2010;1204:17.
thermoplastic polyurethanes. Spectroscopy. 2013;1:11-18.
doi: 10.1063/1.3295638
doi: 10.13189/nn.2013.01030
34. Metropolis N, Ulam S. The monte carlo method. J Am Stat 43. Awad M, Khanna R. Support vector regression. In: Efficient
Assoc. 1949;44(247):335-341. Learning Machines: Theories, Concepts, and Applications for
doi: 10.2307/2280232 Engineers and System Designers. Springer; 2015.
35. Raychaudhuri S. Introduction to monte carlo simulation. In: doi: 10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9

Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025) 77 doi: 10.36922/IJAMD025260022