Page 18 - IJB-1-1

Smart hydrogels for 3D bioprinting

175–180. 101. Kazimierska-Drobny K, El Fray M and Kaczmarek M,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.139. 2015, Determination of mechanical and hydraulic prop-
95. Mahdavinia G R and Etemadi H, 2014, In situ synthesis erties of PVA hydrogels. Materials Science & Engi-
of magnetic CaraPVA IPN nanocomposite hydrogels neering C-Materials for Biological Applications, vol.48:
and controlled drug release. Materials Science & Engi- 48–54.
neering C-Materials for Biological Applications, vol.45: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.034.
250–260. 102. Credi C, Biella S, De Marco C, et al. 2014, Fine tuning
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.023. and measurement of mechanical properties of cros-
96. Szabó D, Czakó-Nagy I, Zrínyi M, et al. 2000, Magnetic slinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels as biomimetic scaf-
and mössbauer studies of magnetite-loaded polyvinyl fold coating in regenerative medicine. Journal of the
alcohol hydrogels. Journal of Colloid and Interface Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol.29:
Science, vol. 221(2): 166–172. 309–316.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1999.6572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.025.
97. Li Y H, Huang G Y, Zhang X H, et al. 2013, Magnetic 103. Melzak K A, Mateescu A, Toca-Herrera J L, et al. 2012,
hydrogels and their potential biomedical applications. Simultaneous measurement of mechanical and surface
Advanced Functional Materials, Vol.23(6): 660–672. properties in thermoresponsive, anchored hydrogel films.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201201708. Langmuir, vol.28(35): 12871–12878.
98. Ng S S, Li C and Chan V, 2011; Experimental and nu- http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la3019666.
merical determination of cellular traction force on po- 104. Kesti M, Müeller M, Becher J, et al. 2015, A versatile
lymeric hydrogels. Inerface Focus, vol.1: 777–791. bioink for three-dimensional printing of cellular scaf-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0036. folds based on thermally and photo-triggered tandem
99. Manzano S, Moreno-Loshuertos R, Doblaré M, et al. gelation. Acta Biomaterialia, vol.11: 162–172.
2015, Structural biology response of a collagen hydrogel http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.033.
synthetic e10.1007xtracellular matrix with embedded 105. Stoychev G, Puretskiy N and Ionov L, 2011,
human fibroblast: computational and experimental Self-folding all-polymer thermoresponsive microcap-
analysis. Medical & Biological Engineering & Compu- sules. Soft Matter, vol.2011(7): 3277–3279.
ting, vol.53: 721–735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C1SM05109A.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1277-8. 106. Jamal M, Kadam S S, Xiao R, et al. 2013, Bio-origami
100. Zhang H, Dai S, Bi J X, et al. 2011, Biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds composed of photocrosslinked PEG
three-dimensional microenvironment for controlling bilayers. Advanced Healthcare Materials, vol.2(8):
stem cell fate. Interface Focus, vol.2011(1): 792–803. 1142–1150.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0035. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200458.

14 International Journal of Bioprinting (2015)–Volume 1, Issue 1