Page 33 - IJB-2-2
P. 33

Jia Min Lee, Swee Leong Sing, Edgar Yong  Sheng Tan,  et al.

            biomimetic  cardiac  tissues. Conventional fabrication   ratio of ECM proteins that have been isolated in de-
            techniques in cardiac tissue engineering can be broad-  cellularized matrix are site-specific [47] .
            ly divided into scaffold-based or scaffold-free fabrica-  Scaffold-based techniques  discussed above are ei-
            tion.  A summary of different conventional fabrication   ther laborious or lack repeatability. Firstly, structures
            techniques in  cardiac tissue engineering is  shown  in   casted out of  molds are restricted  by the design of
            Table 1.                                           master mold. The native structure of myocardium does
               (1) Scaffold-based  Engineered Cardiovascular   not comprise of singular patterns. Instead, cardiomy-
            Tissues                                            cytes alignment varies across the transmural of myo-
               Scaffolds  are  used for attachment and mechanical   cardium [48] . The  effectiveness in  using  molding app-
            support for cardiac cells in scaffold-based approach of   oach to recapture complex native architecture is ques-
            cardiac tissue engineering. In this approach, cells are      tionable.

                                                                 Another major disadvantage of scaffold-based me-
            seeded onto the scaffolds before going through tissue
            maturation. In scaffold fabrication, several methods,   thod is forming non-uniform macro-pore structure in
            such as solvent casting [28–30] , molding [31]  and electros-  casted scaffolds. An alternative  to produce uniform
            pinning [32–38] , have been used. Features on the fabri-  pore size is to use computer aided technology to de-
            cated scaffolds can affect cell responses directly. For   sign scaffolds with defined pore structure and size [49] .
            example, cellular alignment is shown by neonatal rat   Additive manufacturing techniques, such as selective
            heart  cells seeded on laser  microblated  polyglycerol   laser sintering (SLS) [20]  fabricate porous scaffold stru-
            sebacate scaffolds that  have honeycomb microstruc-  ture layer-by-layer with stiffness of fabricated scaffold
            ture [39] .                                        similar to native human myocardium (0.2 mPa). Inkjet
               In an alternative approach, cells are encapsulated   printing technique was also employed for indirect fa-
            within the biomaterials. Hydrogel has been widely used   brication of scaffolds for tissue engineering [50] .
            as the biomaterial to encapsulate cardiac cells [40,41] . Coll-  Lastly, perfusion of decellularized matrix, which is
            agen ring casted with cardiac cell formed compact heart   currently limited to 70% of the original volume, still
            muscles and was grafted onto rat’s epicardum [41,42] . To   remain a challenge  for this  scaffolding approach [51] .
            improve conductivity  of engineered  tissue, gold na-  Also, decellularized matrix repopulated with neonatal
            nowires  are mixed  with  alginate neonatal  rat heart   rat cardiomyocytes showed disarrayed arrangement
            cells and fibroblasts casted into alginate scaffold con-  with disorganized electrical propagation and decreased
            taining the gold nanowires [43] .                  Connexion 43 expression [52] . However, decellularized
               Another technique scaffold-based technique is to   matrix for cardiovascular  tissue engineering remains
            repopulate de-cellularized matrix  with desired  cell   optimistic with optimization in cell perfusion tech-
            population. De-cellularization is  a process  to obtain   niques and improvement on electromechanical proper-
            cell-free scaffold from sacrificial tissue/organ through   ties of decellularized matrix during  the fabrication
            removal of xenogenic cells [44,45] . The technique is first   process.
            used on heart valves and further improvised to repo-  (2) Scaffold-free Engineered Cardiovascular Tissues
            pulate a full heart [46] . A distinct advantage of de-cellul-  As the name suggests, scaffold-free approach does
            rized matrix over hydrogel-based scaffold is retaining   not make use of solid scaffolds, usually  made from
            the  native extracellular  matrix. The composition and   polylactic acid (PLA), polycaprolactone (PCL) and etc.,


                               Table 1. Summary of different fabrication techniques in engineered cardiac tissue

                        Pre-fabricated Matrices    Cell Sheet          Decellularized Matrices   Cell Hydrogel
                                                                                           Encapsulation (Casting)
             Advantage     Inherent structure guid-    Intact cell-cell and cell-matrix junc-   Native extracellular matrix    Electrical coupling is not
                         ance for cell orientation   tion             retained              delayed
                         Tunable mechanical     Ability to beat spontaneously and        Left ventricular dilation
                         properties         synchronously                                   is prevented
                                           Vasculature network establishment
                                            for thick construct (300 – 800 µm)
             Disadvantage    Non-homogeneous cell    Difficult to handle due to thin layers    Sacrificial tissue is required     Difficult to handle thick
                         distribution through   of cell sheets        Identification of ideal sac-  tissue assembly
                         seeding           Limited cell number generated   rificial tissue needed
                                                                      Non-homogeneous distri-
                                                                      bution of re-entry cells

                                        International Journal of Bioprinting (2016)–Volume 2, Issue 2      29
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38