Page 49 - IJB-2-2
P. 49

Huijun Li, Sijun Liu and Lin Li

                                                                         7
            properties such as poor mechanical strength and lack   to > 6 × 10  mPa.s) is suitable for an extrusion-based
                                                                    [3]
            of  structural integrity,  which limits  its applications.   printer . Thus, rheological properties of potential
            Recently, much  effort has  been made for improving   hydrogels for  an extrusion based printer are consi-
            the  performance  of alginate  based  scaffolds.  Com-  dered to be a key factor in controlling the printability
            pounding of alginate with other polymers such as pec-  of the  hydrogels and the fidelity of the printed  3D
            tin [13]  or chitosan [14]  has been found to provide just a   structures.  However, the  relationship between  rheo-
            marginal effect. Meanwhile, graphene oxide (GO) has   logical properties of hydrogels and 3D printability has
            attracted  a great attention in various fields including   not been systematically studied in the literature.
            tissue engineering because of its novel properties such   A printable hydrogel needs to be optimized to have
            as good  electric conductivity,  thermal  conductivity,   low viscosity during printing and sufficient mechani-
            mechanical stiffness, and biocompatible properties [15–18] .   cal strength after printed. So, it is ideal for a printable
            GO sheets have been reported to be ultra-strong and   hydrogel  to have a  thixotropic  property and fast re-
            biocompatible; therefore, GO is a desirable nanoma-  covery ability. However, most of the materials could
            terial for modifying scaffolds used in tissue engineer-  not recover their  properties immediately and  the re-
            ing [19] . The functional groups on GO sheets may im-  covery time depends on the materials and shear rate.
            prove interfacial interaction between GO and a poly-  To improve the quality of printing, it is important to
            mer matrix, which paves the pathways for developing   choose a material with excellent thixotropic properties
            GO based nanocomposites with remarkable mechani-   and print the material with a reasonable recovery time.
            cal properties [20] . For  example, Fan  et al. reported a   For a non-Newtonian fluid, viscosity is a function of
            significant increase of elastic modulus of chitosan by   shear rate in a printing syringe. Finding the relation-
            about  200% with the  addition of  small  amount of   ship between piston speed and shear rate for an extru-
            graphene oxide [17] . Mariana  et al. reported that GO/   sion based  printing process is fundamentally impor-
            alginate films showed superior thermal and mechani-  tant. Furthermore, to study the thixotropic  property
            cal properties  compared  with alginate [21] . However,   one should know the shear rate that is generated by the
            the effect of GO on the alginate hydrogel has not been   piston speed. It is also important to know whether the
            extensively studied in the literature.             breakdown of crosslinks by shearing is reversible after
               In recent years, many researchers and scientists have   removing the shear force.
            investigated the  printability of  materials for extru-  In this study, alginate-based hydrogels were chosen
            sion-based printing. The word,  printability, not  only   as a basic printing  material for an  extrusion-based
            means how easy a hydrogel can be printed out by a 3D   printer. Rheological studies were performed for the
            printer, but also implies how stable a printed 3D con-  samples  with different formulas. The  range of shear
            struct or scaffold  is. The latter is  more  important  in   rate that the hydrogels  suffered during printing  was
            real  applications of bio-fabrication. For example,   deduced. This range of shear rates helped us to select
            Chung’s group found that the alginate-gelatin hydro-  a proper shear rate to investigate the thixotropic prop-
            gel had to be printed at low temperatures as the gela-  erties  of the  hydrogels. Graphene oxide (GO) was
            tion temperature for alginate-gelatin hydrogels is aro-  added to modify the rheological  properties and  3D
            und 11°C [22] . Jia  et al.  evaluated the  printability of   printability of the hydrogels. Furthermore, some mea-
            hydrogel  by  using a point-to-point strategy to print   sureable parameters were defined for quantifying the
            several dots and found that the plot of dots areas and   quality of 3D printing.
            viscosity can directly shows the relationship between
            printability and viscosity of different samples. Mean-  2. Materials and Methods
            while, the results indicated that the optimal range of   2.1 Materials and Sample Preparation
            kinematic viscosity for a piston driven system is from
                                2
                                  [6]
            about 400 to 3000 mm /s . Murphy et al. concluded   Sodium alginate was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich,
            that there are many factors influencing the printability   Singapore. According  to the supplier,  the molecular
            of materials, such as pressure, flow rate, viscosity, etc.   weight of the sodium alginate ranged from 100,000 to
            They summarized a range of viscosities for different   150,000 g/mol and the G block content was 50%–60%.
            3D bio-printers (inkjet, extrusion-based and laser as-  Calcium chloride with 99% ACS grade was obtained
            sisted) based  on the previous studies and concluded   from Sigma-Aldrich, Singapore. Graphene oxide (GO)
            that the sample with the range of viscosity (30 mPa.s   was a product of XF NANO (Nanjing, China). All

                                        International Journal of Bioprinting (2016)–Volume 2, Issue 2      55
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54