Page 71 - IJB-2-2
P. 71

Atra Malayeri, Colin Sherborne, Thomas Paterson, et al.

              26.  Lumelsky  Y, Lalush-Michael I, Levenberg  S,  et al.,   63 human osteosarcoma cells grown in monolayer and
                 2009, A degradable, porous, emulsion-templated polya-  as three-dimensional tumor spheroids present a different
                                                                                    1
                 crylate.  Journal of Polymer Science Part A  Polymer   metabolic profile:  a  H NMR study.  FEBS Letters,
                 Chemistry, vol.47(24): 7043–7053.                  vol.557(1–3): 148–154.
                 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pola.23744               http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01466-2
              27.  Silverstein M S, 2014, Emulsion-templated porous po-  30.  Trojani C, Weiss P, Michiels J  F,  et al.,  2005, Three-
                 lymers: a retrospective perspective. Polymer, vol.55(1):   dimensional culture and differentiation of human osteo-
                 304–320.                                           genic  cells in an injectable hydroxypropylmethylcellu-
                 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.08.068    lose hydrogel. Biomaterials, vol.26(27): 5509–5517.
              28.  Chen P Y and  McKittrick J, 2011, Compressive me-  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.001
                 chanical properties of demineralized and deproteinized   31.  Kale S, Biermann S, Edwards  C,  et al., 2000, Three-
                 cancellous bone. Journal of Mechanical Behavior of Bio-  dimensional cellular development is essential for ex vivo
                 medical Materials, vol.4(7): 961–973.              formation of human bone. Nature Biotechnology, vol.18:
                 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.02.006      954–958.
              29.  Santini M T, Rainaldi G, Romano R, et al., 2004, MG-   http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/79439


























































                                        International Journal of Bioprinting (2016)–Volume 2, Issue 2      77
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76