Page 468 - IJB-10-2
P. 468

International Journal of Bioprinting                                Bioprinting with ASCs and bioactive glass




            1%  100×  antibiotic/antimycotic.  On  the  second  day  of   time to test viscosity, recovery, yield strength, etc. Three
            culture, ASCs were washed with phosphate-buffered saline   different  tests  were  conducted on  the  gels:  (i)  viscosity
            (PBS), viable ASCs were harvested with 0.25% trypsin/1   vs. shear rate (to measure viscosity with increasing shear
            mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and re-  rate from 0.1 to 100 s ), (ii) oscillation amplitude sweep,
                                                                                 -1
            plated at a concentration of no more than 15,000 ASCs   and (iii) recovery tests (changing shear rate from steady
            per dish. ASCs that reached ≤70% confluency were lifted   state  to a predetermined rate for a certain amount of
            between the second and sixth passages for suspension in   time). In oscillation amplitude sweeps, percentage strain
            AG hydrogels for all experiments. ASCs from subsequent   was considered input, and machine output data of loss vs.
            passages were not utilized for experiments as they could   storage modulus components were plotted. Data points
            affect pluripotent properties of ASCs.             below 0.1 s  shear rate were not reported because of the
                                                                        -1
                                                               instability at low shear rates. Although one set of data was
            2.2. Bioink preparation                            reported for each gel type, measurements were repeated
            Gelatin (Type B, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)   to confirm the validity of the data. Statistical analysis of
            in 3 w/v % (0.3 g in 10 mL) was dissolved in Dulbecco’s   the rheological data was not performed because of the
            Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Gibco, Thermo Fisher   significant differences between the samples prepared with
            Scientific, MA, USA) in a glass beaker at ~40°C while being   several orders of magnitudes difference in results.
            magnetically stirred at 150 rpm. After gelatin dissolution,
            sodium alginate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 3   2.4. Scaffold fabrication
            w/v % (0.3 g in 10 mL) was added to the gelatin solution   A  custom-modified tabletop cartesian  3D printer  to
            and mixed overnight to obtain the AG hydrogel. B3 glass   include syringes connected through digital syringe
            powder particles (less than 20 µm with ~3 µm d  particle   dispenser (Loctite , Rocky Hill, CT, USA) was used to
                                                                              ®
                                                   50
            size; chemical composition in wt.%: 53% B O , 20% CaO,   fabricate scaffolds. The 3D printer and printing schema
                                              2
                                                 3
            12% K O, 6% Na O, 5% MgO, 4% P O ) were added to the   are illustrated in Figure 1a and b, and the 3D printer is
                         2
                 2
                                          5
                                        2
            solution in four different weight ratios (0.075, 0.15, 0.3, and   shown in  Figure 1c. Scaffold dimensions were set to 15
            0.6 w/v %) after gelatin dissolution and allowed to dissolve   mm length, 15 mm width, and ~ 1 mm thickness (6 layers)
            for ~10 min before the addition of alginate powder. For   and printed with 0–90° filament orientation in alternate
            example, 0.075 w/v % B3 glass corresponds to 1.25%   layers. A customized software was written for G-code
            of  total  combined  weight  of  alginate  and  gelatin  in  the   generation and syringe dispenser control. Sterile practices
            solution. Therefore, AG hydrogels made with 0.075, 0.15,   were followed for scaffold fabrication with ASCs, bioink
            0.3, and 0.6 w/v % B3 glass are referred as 1.25G, 2.5G, 5G,   syringes were maintained at room temperature, and the
            and 10G, respectively, in this paper. All powders including   scaffolds were bioprinted in less than an hour inside the
            gelatin, sodium alginate, and B3 glass powder particles were   laminar flow hood.
            ultraviolet-sterilized before being added to the DMEM
                                    6
            solution. ASCs pellet (4 × 10 ) was re-suspended in 0.2   2.5. Physical assessment
            mL CCM and pipetted into AG hydrogel and magnetically   Test specimens with overall dimensions of 40 × 20 × 5
                                                                  3
            stirred for no more than 3 min to obtain a uniform cell   mm  were fabricated to have a 20 mm gauge length and
            distribution and a final ASC concentration of 1.0 × 10 cells   10 mm section width for tensile tests. Dense specimens
                                                      6
            per 1 mL of bioink. The bioink was transferred to 3 mL   without any designed pores were used for these tests, and
            Loctite  Henkel syringe barrel, centrifuged to remove air   specimens  were  crosslinked  with  0.1  M  CaCl   solution
                 ®
                                                                                                     2
            bubbles, and attached with 22G (410 µm) or 25G (250 µm)   for 10 min before tensile tests. Specimens were tested on
            tips (SmoothFlow Tapered, Nordson EFD, Westlake, OH,   Instron machine (Instron 5969, Norwood, MA, USA) at a
            USA) for 3D bioprinting.                           crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The swelling properties of
                                                               the hydrogel were assessed on scaffolds with dimensions
            2.3. Rheological characterization                  of 15 × 15 × 1 mm . Swelling percentage (S) was calculated
                                                                             3
            For rheological characterization, hydrogels were prepared   using the formula, S = [(S  – S )/S] × 100, where S  is scaffold
                                                                                                     t
                                                                                      c
                                                                                   t
            in deionized (DI) water with gelatin (3 w/v %), alginate   weight after 24 h soak in DI water, and S  is scaffold weight
            (3 w/v %), and AG (6 w/v %), and with the addition of   immediately after crosslinking.   c
            B3 glass in different weight concentrations. AG hydrogels
            with and without B3 glass were tested for viscosity using   2.6. Scanning electron microscopy
            a Kinexus rheometer (Malvern Panalytical, Westborough,   Hydrogel in bulk (~2–3 mL in a centrifuge tube) was freeze-
            MA, USA) with a parallel plate set-up. A gap of 0.5 mm was   dried to porous foam-like pellets. The pellets were coated
            set between plates, and the measurements were conducted   with Au-Pd for about ~60 s by mounting the samples on
            at room temperature. A fresh scoop of gel was loaded each   a rotating platform using a Hummer Sputter Coater. The

            Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024)                       460                                doi. 10.36922/ijb.2057
   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473