Page 16 - IJB-5-1

Biofabrication offers future hope for tackling various obstacles and challenges in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: A Perspective
191–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883911513481892. and biomaterials for future developments of bioprinting and
68. Zhao X, Liu L, Wang J, et al., 2014, In vitro vascularization of biofabrication. Biofabrication, 2: 14110–14116. https://doi.
a combined system based on a 3D printing technique. J Tissue org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/014110.
Eng Regen Med, 10(10): 833–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/ 80. Moroni L, Boland T, Burdick J A, et al., 2017,
term.1863. Biofabrication: A guide to technology and terminology.
69. Yao R, Zhang R, Yan Y, et al., 2009, In vitro angiogenesis of Trends Biotechnol, 36(4): 384–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
3D tissue engineered adipose tissue. J Bioact Compat Polym, tibtech.2017.10.015.
24(1): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883911508099367. 81. Mir T A, Nakamura M., 2017, 3D–bio printing: Towards
70. Xu M, Wang X, Yan Y, et al.,2010, A cell–assembly derived the era of manufacturing human organs as spare parts for
physiological 3D model of the metabolic syndrome, based healthcare and medicine. Tissue Eng Part B, 23(3): 245–256.
on adipose–derived stromal cells and a gelatin/alginate/ https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2016.0398. https://doi.
fibrinogen matrix. Biomaterials, 31 (14): 3868–3877. https:// org/10.1042/BA20030108.
doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.111. 82. Sun W, Lal P., 2004, Recent development on computer
71. Xu M, Yan Y, Liu H, et al., 2009, Control adipose–derived aided tissue engineering: Overview, scope and challenges.
stromal cells differentiation into adipose and endothelial cells Biotechnol Appl Biochem, 39: 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1042/
in a 3–D structure established by cell–assembly technique. BA20030108.
Adv Obstetr Gynecol, 57(1): 279–283. 83. Sanjairaj V., 2016, 3D bioprinting of skin: A state–of–the–art
72. Li S, Yan Y, Xiong Z, et al., 2009, Gradient hydrogel review on modeling, materials, and processes. Biofabrication.
construct based on an improved cell assembling system. 8(3): 32001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032001.
J Bioact Compat Polym, 24(1): 84–99. https://doi. 84. Whitford W, Hoying J B., 2017, Digital biomanufacturing
org/10.1177/0883911509103357. supporting vascularization in 3D bioprinting. Int J Bioprint,
73. Xu Y, Wang X, 2015, Fluid and cell behaviors along a 3D 3(1): 18–26. https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2017.01.002.
printed alginate/gelatin/fibrin channel. Biotechnol Bioeng, 85. Brown F, Hahn M., 2012, Informatics technologies in an
112(8): 1683–1695. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25579. evolving R and D landscape. Bioprocess Int, 10(6): 64–69.
74. Ghazanfari A, Li W, Leu M C, et al., 2017. A novel 86. Hiller J, Lipson H., 2009, Design and analysis of digital
freeform extrusion fabrication process for producing materials for physical 3D voxel printing. Rapid Prototyp J,
solid ceramic components with uniform layered radiation 15: 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540910943441.
drying. Addit Manuf, 15:102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. 87. da Silva J V, Martins T A, Noritomi P Y.,2012, Scaffold
addma.2017.04.001. informatics and biomimetic design: Three–dimensional
75. Lee J S, Hong J M, Jung J W, et al., 2014, 3D printing medical reconstruction. Methods Mol Biol, 868: 91–109.
of composite tissue with complex shape applied to ear https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-764-4_6.
regeneration. Biofabrication, 6(2): 24103. https://doi. 88. Fan H, Scott C., 2015, From chips to CHO cells: IT advances
org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024103. in upstream bioprocessing. Bioprocess Int, 13(11): 14–29.
76. Duan B, Kapetanovic E, Hockaday L A, et al., 2014, Three– 89. John G T., 2016, Using optical sensors for bioprocess
dimensional printed trileaflet valve conduits using biological monitoring: A measurement technique for bioprocessors.
hydrogels and human valve interstitial cells. Acta Biomateria, Bioprocess Int, 14(3): S45–S48.
10: 1836–1846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.005. 90. Schmitt S., 2015, Information instead of data: User–friendly
77. Kolesky D B, Homan K A, Skylar–Scott M A, et al., 2016, HMI concept increases process control efficiency. Bioprocess
Three–dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Int, 13(5): 42–46.
Proc Nat Acad Sci, 113: 3179–3184. https://doi.org/10.1073/ 91. Moore C., 2016, Harnessing the power of big data to improve
pnas.1521342113. drug R and D. Bioprocess Int, 14(8) 2016: 64;
78. Campos D F, Blaeser A, Korsten A, et al., 2014, The stiffness 92. Unadkat H V, Hulsman M, Cornelissen K, et al., 2011,
and structure of three–dimensional printed hydrogels direct An algorithm–based topographical biomaterials library to
the differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells toward instruct cell fate. Proc Nat Acad Sci, 108: 16565–16570.
adipogenic and osteogenic lineage. Tissue Eng Part A, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109861108.
21: 740–756. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0231. 93. Dalby M J, Gadegaard N, Oreffo R O., 2014, Harnessing
79. Nakamura M, Iwanaga S, Henmi C, et al., 2010, Biomatrices nanotopography and integrin–matrix interactions to influence

10 International Journal of Bioprinting (2019)–Volume 5, Issue 1