Page 18 - IJB-5-1
P. 18

REVIEW ARTICLE

           Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds


           Youwen Yang  1,2† , Guoyong Wang , Huixin Liang , Chengde Gao , Shuping Peng , Lida Shen  and
                                            1†
                                                            3
                                                                           2
                                                                                                       3
                                                                                           4
           Cijun Shuai 1,2,5 *
           1 Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
           2 State Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
           3 College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 210016 Nanjing, China
           4 Hunan Provincial Tumor Hospital and the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South
           University, Changsha 410013, China
           5 Key Laboratory of Organ Injury, Aging and Regenerative Medicine of Hunan Province, Changsha 410008, China
           †These authors contributed equally to this work.

           Abstract: Additive manufacturing (AM) can obtain not only customized external shape but also porous internal structure for
           scaffolds, both of which are of great importance for repairing large segmental bone defects. The scaffold fabrication process
           generally involves scaffold design, AM, and post-treatments. Thus, this article firstly reviews the state-of-the-art of scaffold
           design, including computer-aided design, reverse modeling, topology optimization, and mathematical modeling. In addition,
           the current characteristics of several typical AM techniques, including selective laser sintering, fused deposition modeling
           (FDM), and electron beam melting (EBM), especially their advantages and limitations are presented. In particular, selective
           laser sintering is able to obtain scaffolds with nanoscale grains, due to its high heating rate and a short holding time. However,
           this character usually results in insufficient densification. FDM can fabricate scaffolds with a relative high accuracy of pore
           structure but with a relative low mechanical strength. EBM with a high beam-material coupling efficiency can process high
           melting point metals, but it exhibits a low-resolution and poor surface quality. Furthermore, the common post-treatments, with
           main focus on heat and surface treatments, which are applied to improve the comprehensive performance are also discussed.
           Finally, this review also discusses the future directions for AM scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

           Keywords: Additive manufacturing; bone scaffolds; scaffolds design; post-treatments

           *Correspondence to: Cijun Shuai, Central South University, China; shuai@csu.edu.cn
           Received: June 09, 2018; Accepted: July 09, 2018; Published Online: December 12, 2018
           Citation: Yang Y, Wang G, Liang H, et al., 2019, Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds. Int J Bioprint, 5(1): 148. http://dx/doi.
           org/10.18063/IJB.v5i1.148

           1. Introduction                                    in clinical  surgeries to aid in the healing  of these large
                                                              segmental bone defects. Data from the center for disease
           Bone tissue is able to subject to biological  remodeling   control  show that  bone is the second most commonly
           through a dynamic  process of the  absorption  of mature   graft tissue, with more than 2 million surgical operations
           bone tissue by osteoclasts and subsequent generation of   utilizing bone grafts annually . Autografts taken from the
                                                                                      [5]
           new bone induced by osteoblasts [1,2] . Nevertheless, the   patient-self are considered as the gold standard for bone
           body  usually  cannot  fulfill  the  self-repairing  as  a  large   repair . However, the size of the autograft is very limited.
                                                                   [6]
           segmental bone defect occurs, in which the bone defect   Moreover, harvesting the autograft inevitably  causes an
           exceeds a critical size of about 10 mm . In this condition,  additional surgical trauma associated with a serious risk
                                           [3]
           an external intervention is required to aid in the self-  of morbidity at the donor site. Allografts taken from other
           repairing by means of building bridges on the bone defect  persons are  an alternative  and are  in larger supply as
           site .  Therefore, bone grafts are extensively required  compared with the autografts. However, they usually lead
              [4]
           Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds. © 2019 Shuai. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial
           4.0 International 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
           properly cited.
                                                                                                             1
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23