Page 19 - IJB-5-1
P. 19

Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds
                                                   [7]
           to disease transmission and immune  rejection . Thus,
           idea  bone substitutes are urgently  demanded  for bone
           tissue repair in surgical application.
           Desired bone substitutes should have a customized external
           shape, aiming to avoid the excess removal of bone tissue
           at defect sites. More importantly, they also need to have
           porous and interconnected pore structure, so as to create
           a microenvironment, which is conducive to cell activity
           and reproduction [8,9] . To obtain scaffolds with the porous
           structure for bone repair, several approaches, such as pore-
           forming agent method [10,11] , gas foaming method [12,13] , sol-
           gel  method [14,15] , and  freezing  drying  method [16,17] , have
           been proposed. Although these methods exhibit a certain
           ability to fabricate porous structure, they are also with
           some limitations, such as inaccurate control of the pore
           structure and poor ability to customize for specific defect   Figure 1.  A schematic  diagram for the design, additive
           sites . Moreover, some of these approaches inevitably   manufacturing  (AM), post-treatments  of bone scaffolds, and
              [18]
           leave some organic residues of pore-forming agent, which   several typical  AM-derived scaffolds. Images adapted from
           will reduce the biological properties of the scaffolds and   references [29-32] .
           sacrifice the quality of bone repair. Therefore, exploring
           a fabrication technique that is not only limited to obtain   scaffolds. Several typical  structure design methods are
           the individual external shape but also accurately control   first  examined,  especially  the  mathematical  modeling
           the pore structure for scaffolds is of great significance for   method, which can achieve with both bionic design and
           their further orthopedic application.               topological  optimization  of scaffolds. Following on,
           Additive  manufacturing  (AM) can produce a porous   the most relevant  AM techniques using for scaffolds
           scaffold with individual  external  shape and porous   fabrication, with their advantages and disadvantages, are
           internal  structure . Before  AM process, a three-  highlighted. The common post-treatments related to AM-
                          [19]
           dimensional (3D) scaffold model is generally designed   derived scaffolds are also discussed. Finally, the future
           with  desired  architecture  using computer-aided  design   trends for AM scaffolds for bone repair are addressed.
           (CAD) software. The 3D scaffold model is sliced into a
           series of two-dimensional (2D) slices before converting   2. Scaffold Design
           to  typical  Stereolithography  (STL)  files,  which  contain   Scaffold  design  is  an  important  step  in  AM bone
           detailed  2D slice  information. Based on these  STL   scaffolds.  This is because  the features  of the porous
           files,  an AM  machine  performs  the  necessary  toolpath   structure,  including the  porosity, pore  size,  and
           along the 2D directions for direct building of 2D layers.   pore  interconnectivity,  have  great  influence  on  their
           Each layer is just built on top of the other to construct   biological  performance  and mechanical  properties [23-25] .
           a 3D part. Due to the fabrication process of adding one   In particular, an appropriate pore size and high porosity
           layer on the previous one, this manufacturing technique   facilitate the absorption of nutrients and the excretion of
           is described as  AM. Currently, researchers  around   metabolic waste, thus providing a suitable environment
           the  world are  committed  to  apply  AM techniques  to   for the growth of bone tissue . Meanwhile, the internal
                                                                                       [26]
           produce  porous implants  for bone  repair. For instance,   pore structure and the distribution of materials directly
           Poukens  successfully applied AM to fabricate porous   influence  the  plasticity  and  stiffness,  thus  determining
                  [20]
           mandible implant, which was subsequently implanted in   the stress environment of the surrounding bone tissue as
           a patient. Brazilian Jardini et al.  used an AM processed   implanted  in vivo . Besides, the mechanical  function
                                     [21]
                                                                              [27]
           customized  porous scaffold to repair  a large cranial   of the scaffolds dynamically changes after implantation,
           defect. Australian  Peter  implanted  the  AM-derived   which  should be  taken  into  consideration  in  scaffolds
                                [22]
           porous titanium implants into a 71-year-old patient who   design. On the other hand, the external  shape features
           faced an amputation of the heel bone. All these successes   of the  scaffolds should conform  to  the  morphological
           positively render the AM techniques a promising future   characteristics  of  the  defect  site  to  obtain  the  desired
           for bone tissue repair.                             shape. It should be noted that the designed scaffolds are
           A typical application of porous scaffolds fabricated by AM   required  to  easily  build  using  specific AM  techniques.
           includes the scaffolds design, AM, and post-treatments,   For instance, the overhanging structure commonly causes
           as schematically  illustrated  in  Figure 1.  Therefore,   some undesirable defects, if a corresponding supporting
           this  work reviews the  overall process for AM of bone   structure is absent when it is building .
                                                                                              [28]
           2                           International Journal of Bioprinting (2019)–Volume 5, Issue 1
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24