Page 42 - IJB-5-2

A novel inkjet system for live cell bioprinting
Conflicts of Interest 12. Herran CL, Huang Y, Chai W, 2012, Performance Evaluation of

The authors are employees of the sponsor of this study. Bipolar and Tripolar Excitations During Nozzle-jetting-based
However, this did not influence the objectivity of the Alginate Microsphere Fabrication. J Micromech Microeng,
study. The authors declare that they do not have any 22(8):85025. DOI 10.1088/0960-1317/22/8/085025.
competing interests. 13. Kim YK, Park JA, Yoon WH, et al., 2016, Drop-on-demand
Inkjet-based Cell Printing with 30-μm Nozzle Diameter
References
for Cell-level Accuracy. Biomicrofluidics, 10(6):064110.
1. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, et al., 2007, Induction DOI 10.1063/1.4968845.
of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts 14. Arai K, Iwanaga S, Toda H, et al., 2011, Three-dimensional Inkjet
by Defined Factors. Cell, 131(5):861-72. DOI 10.1016/j. Biofabrication Based on Designed Images. Biofabrication,
cell.2007.11.019. 3(3):34113. DOI 10.1088/1758-5082/3/3/034113.
2. Groll J, Boland T, Blunk T, et al., 2016, Biofabrication: 15. Cui X, Boland T, 2009, Human Microvasculature Fabrication
Reappraising the Definition in an Evolving Field. using Thermal Inkjet Printing Technology. Biomaterials,
Biofabrication, 8(1):13001-6. DOI 10.1088/1758- 30(31):6221-7. DOI 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.056.
5090/8/1/013001. 16. Faulkner-Jones A, Fyfe C, Cornelissen DJ, et al., 2015,
3. Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D Bioprinting of Tissues Bioprinting of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells and their
and Organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32(8):773-85. DOI 10.1038/ Directed Differentiation into Hepatocyte-like Cells for the
nbt.2958. Generation of Mini-livers in 3D. Biofabrication, 7(4):44102.
4. Arslan-Yildiz A, El Assal R, Chen P, et al., 2016, Towards DOI 10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/044102.
Artificial Tissue Models: Past, Present, and Future of 3D 17. Nakamura M, Iwanaga S, Henmi C, et al., 2010,
Bioprinting. Biofabrication, 8(1):14103. DOI 10.1088/1758- Biomatrices and Biomaterials for Future Developments of
5090/8/1/014103. Bioprinting and Biofabrication. Biofabrication, 2(1):14110.
5. Gudupati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I, 2016, A Comprehensive DOI 10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/014110.
Review on Droplet-based Bioprinting: Past, Present 18. Perçin G, Khuri-Yakub BT, 2003, Piezoelectric Droplet
and Future. Biomaterials, 102:20-42. DOI 10.1016/j. Ejector for Ink-jet Printing of Fluids and Solid Particles. Rev
biomaterials.2016.06.012. Sci Instrum, 74(2):1120-7. DOI 10.1063/1.1532839.
6. Derby B, 2008, Bioprinting: Inkjet Printing Proteins and 19. Zhang Z, Chai W, Xiong R, et al., 2017, Printing-induced
Hybrid Cell-containing Materials and Structures. J Mater Cell Injury Evaluation During Laser Printing of 3T3
Chem, 18(47):5717-21. DOI 10.1039/b807560c. Mouse Fibroblasts. Biofabrication, 9(2):25038. DOI
7. Xu T, Jin J, Gregory C, et al., 2005, Inkjet Printing of Viable 10.1088/1758-5090/aa6ed9.
Mammalian Cells. Biomaterials, 26(1):93-9. DOI 10.1016/j. 20. Hu W, Berdugo C, Chalmers JJ, 2011, The Potential of
biomaterials.2004.04.011. Hydrodynamic Damage to Animal Cells of Industrial
8. Nakamura M, Kobayashi A, Takagi F, et al., 2005, Relevance: Current Understanding. Cytotechnology,
Biocompatible Inkjet Printing Technique for Designed Seeding 63(5):445-60. DOI 10.1007/s10616-011-9368-3.
of Individual Living Cells. Tissue Eng, 11(11-12):1658-66. 21. Moon S, Hasan SK, Song YS, et al., 2010, Layer by Layer
DOI 10.1089/ten.2005.11.1658. Three-dimensional Tissue Epitaxy by Cell-laden Hydrogel
9. Saunders RE, Gough JE, Derby B, 2008, Delivery of Human Droplets. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 16(1):157-66.
Fibroblast Cells by Piezoelectric Drop-on-demand Inkjet DOI 10.1089/ten.tec.2009.0179.
Printing. Biomaterials, 29(2):193-203. DOI 10.1016/j. 22. Koch L, Deiwick A, Schlie S, et al., 2012, Skin Tissue Generation
biomaterials.2007.09.032. by Laser Cell Printing. Biotechnol Bioeng, 109(7):1855-63.
10. Gross A, Schöndube J, Niekrawitz S, et al., 2013, Single- 23. Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP, et al., 2013, 25 Anniversary
th
cell Printer: Automated, on Demand, and Label Free. J Lab Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication. Adv
Autom, 18(6):504-18. DOI 10.1177/2211068213497204. Mater, 25(36):5011-28. DOI 10.1002/adma.201302042.
11. Cheng E, Yu H, Ahmadi A, et al., 2016, Investigation of 24. Jungst T, Smolan W, Schacht K, et al., 2016, Strategies
the Hydrodynamic Response of Cells in Drop on Demand and Molecular Design Criteria for 3D Printable
Piezoelectric Inkjet Nozzles. Biofabrication, 8(1):15008. Hydrogels. Chem Rev, 116(3):1496-539. DOI 10.1021/acs.
DOI 10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/015008. chemrev.5b00303.

38 International Journal of Bioprinting (2019)–Volume 5, Issue 2