Page 422 - IJB-10-5
P. 422

International Journal of Bioprinting                                     Stability of 3D-printed PEO tablets















































            Figure 5. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) chromatograms of (a) pure polyethylene oxide (PEO; 7M) and (b) physical mixture (PM), hot-melt
            extrudate (HME), and printed samples of F , displaying reduction and shifts in peak 1 due to PEO degradation after each thermal process.
                                       1

            PM samples (red line in Figure 5b) exhibited two signals;   broadening. Moreover, the ratio of the intensity of the peaks
            a sharp peak (peak 1) at the same retention time of PEO   (PEO to HPC; peak 1/peak 2) decreased in the order: PM
            7 M (~9.5 min) and a broader peak (peak 2) at 10–14   > HME > 3D-printed samples. These observations can be
            min,  indicating  HPC  in  the  PM  formulation.  However,   explained by the reduction in PEO M  during processing,
                                                                                             w
            the intensity of the PEO 7 M signal at peak 1 in HME and   resulting in smaller chains with higher retention time. The
            printed samples decreased significantly compared to PM   3D-printed samples undergo two thermal processes: one
            samples despite having the same starting composition   in HME while making filament extrudates and another
            and concentration. The relative intensity of each peak was   in the 3D printer; thus, these samples exhibit the highest
            calculated and reported in Table 3.                reduction in the PEO 7 M signal (peak 1).
               Chromatograms for HME and 3D-printed tablets    3.5. Particle size analysis of ground filaments
            (Figure 5) display a delayed peak 1 signal with obvious   Grinding the HME filaments of all the developed
                                                               formulations in this study resulted in coarse, flake-shaped
            Table 3. Relative intensity of peaks 1 and 2 after each   particles (Figure 6), whereas the PM powders were fine
            manufacturing process.                             (<400 µm). The size distribution and arithmetic average
                                                               particle size were determined using sieves.   Figure 7
                                                                                                    20
             Sample          Relative intensity of peak 1/peak 2   displays the particle size distribution of ground filaments
             PM                        1.47                    of all formulations. The plasticity of PEO results in coarse
             HME                        0.9                    particles with irregular shapes upon grinding the filaments.
             Printed                   0.45                    For thermoplastic polymers, like PEO, it is challenging to
            Abbreviations: PM: Physical mixture; HME: Hot-melt extrudates.  obtain fine particles due to plastic deformation rather than

            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       414                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4055
   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427