Page 35 - IJB-7-1
        P. 35
     Attarilar, et al.
           Table 1. (Continued)
            Technique          Pros                                 Cons                            References
           Direct  ink  writing  • Easy to use with hydrogels       •  It is not a good choice for complex   [76,77]
           (DIW)               • Simple nature                       parts and processes
                               • Possibility to use multiple inks   •  Crucial  to  carefully  control  the
                               • Cost-effectiveness                  thickening  and  thinning  agents  in
                               • Environmental friendliness          bio-ink
                                                                    •  Hard   to   attain   the   desired
                                                                     microstructure
                                                                    • Hard to extrude liquids
           Fused     deposition  •  Lower  toxicity  compared  to  3D  printing  •  Need  to  use  additional  support   [78]
           modeling (FDM)       with photopolymers                   structure
                               • Cheap procedure                    • Need to do post-processing
                                                                    • Low resolution
           Bioplotting         • Possibility to print viable cells  • Limited size ranges for nozzle   [74]
                               • Suitable for soft tissue           •  Need  to  use  additional  support
                                                                     structure
           Laser-assisted      • Excellent precision printing       • Expensive                       [74,77]
           bioprinting (LAB)   • Single-cell patterns               • Scaffolds have limited heights
                               • It can use various bioactive materials
                               • It can print different solutions at a time
                               • Easy automation
                               • High throughput
           with  materials  without  any  pores.  This  parameter  can   ends due to isolated pore structures impede the growth
           be  influenced  by  pore  size,  strut  thickness,  and  pore   of the cells and cause poor cellular interactions, such as
           shape. It is believed that higher porosities lead to better   differentiation,  osteogenesis,  and  angiogenesis.  Higher
           growth of osteon cells, increase the surface area which   values of the influencing factors, such as detour indexes
           causes more cellular interactions, and provide proper   and pore throats, can sometimes lead to suppression of
           interface-locking  in  laser-processed  porous  titanium .   the proper bone ingrowth and tissue formation .
                                                        [89]
                                                                                                     [94]
           Moreover, it has been shown that pore shape can affect   It  is  difficult  to  obtain  the  desired  pore  size  and
           osteogenic  differentiation .  The  improved  osteogenic   shape,  porosity,  and  interconnection  at  the  microscale
                                 [90]
           differentiation  was  observed  on  scaffolds  with  high   level  with  traditional  ways  and  evaluate  their  possible
           porosities compared to low-density ones . In fact, the   biological effects. However, it is rather simple to obtain
                                              [91]
           porosity of human trabecular bone is within in the range   well-designed  and  regular  pore  structures  through  AM
           of 70 – 90%, so this range seems to be suitable for a 3D   technology.  The  CAD-based  models  can  be  utilized  to
           printed  implant.  In  a  previous  study  by  Cheng  et al.,   predesign and produce any kind of porous structure using
           different porosities (70%, 37.9%, and 15%) were designed   3DP technologies. Two porous structures can be used: The
           in EBM-produced Ti6Al4V samples, and the sample with   honeycomb-like structure is a CAD-based structure with
           the highest porosity has a higher potential for stimulating   a diamond lattice, in which each atom is enveloped by
           osteoblast differentiation than the other samples . Other   four neighboring atoms [95,96] , while the cubic structure is
                                                   [92]
           studies also confirmed this observation and asserted that   formed by scanning powder layers with the use of electron
           implants with porosities similar to human bone’s (70 –   beams in constant intervals and parallel manner, and in
           90%) had the best bone ingrowth and greatly improved   every eighth layer, the scanning direction is rotated 90° .
                                                                                                            [97]
           cell viability, but there would be some differences about
           the results of other biological responses toward porosity,   (4) Lattice structure topologies
           like cell proliferation and differentiation [87,93] .  Many  studies  have  focused  on  improving  the  lattice
                                                               designs,  especially  on  from  the  aspects  of  weight
           (3) Interconnectivity of pores
                                                               reduction  and  customizability,  and  various  lattice
           The  interconnectivity  of  pores  determines  whether  the   structure  topologies  have  therefore  been  proposed.  In
           pores are connected or isolated. Formation of tissues in the   this regard, truss lattices with interconnecting struts in a
           interconnective structures can be progressively continued   3D space are among the well-known class of lightweight
           from the openings up to the central regions while dead   parts. They have superior strength, stiffness, and energy
                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 7        31
     	
