Page 216 - IJB-8-1
P. 216

Nano-Hydroxyapatite Bone Scaffolds with Different Porous Structures Processed by Digital Light Processing 3D Printing
                        A                                    B















                        C                                      D
















           Figure 2. Slurry properties, thermogravimetric analysis of HA green part, and heating strategy. (A) Viscosity with different shear rates.
           (B) The relationship between cure depth and energy doses. (C) TGA and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) curve. (D) Debinding and
           sintering strategy.

                        C = 229 8. * lnE (  0  /  6 89.  )    (3.3)  for removing the organic phase of green parts. Besides,
                         d
                                                               the other heating stages were heated with 1°C/min up to
               From  Equation  3.3,  the  value  of  cure  sensitivity   1250°C. After holding 3 h, the temperature in the furnace
           reached  299.8,  indicating  high  curing  abilities  and  fast   was gradually decreased to 800°C in 100 min to remove
           photo-polymerization speed.                         the residual thermal stress of sintered scaffolds.
               During  the  DLP  printing,  the  cure  depth  should   X-ray  diffraction  was  performed  to  confirm  the
           exceed  the  printing  layer  thickness  to  guarantee  a   phase composition of the HA powder and sintered HA
           sufficient interface combination between layers to avoid   ceramic.  The  standard  peaks  of  HA  powders  (~25.9°,
           the  delamination  and  laminar  crack  in  the  sintering .   ~31.9°,  ~33.0°,  etc.)  have  an  agreement  with  the  HA
                                                        [31]
           Therefore, considering both the cure depth of the slurry   PDF card (PDF#73-1731) showing that the purity of the
           and printer set-up, 30 µm was set as the printing layer   HA powders, as shown in Figure 3. After sintering, the
           thickness. ~10 mJ/cm  of energy dose with cure depth of   new  peaks,  such  as  ~31.1°  and  ~34.5°,  were  detected
                             2
           ~105 µm was correspondingly applied in the printing.  demonstrating the phase transformation from HA to beta-
               An  optimized  debinding  strategy  was  beneficial   tricalcium  phosphate  (β-TCP)  occurred.  However,  the
           for  obtaining  crack-free  HA  scaffold.  The  thermal   strong peaks of HA verified that HA was still abundant in
           decomposition of the green parts and the corresponding   the sintered ceramics. The transformation was common,
           debinding strategy is shown in Figure 2C and D. Before   which  was  also  published  in  many  studies [33,34] .  The
           ~300°C, there was rarely mass loss in the green parts .   presence of β-TCP is beneficial for BTE applications as it
                                                        [32]
           Most of the mass loss occurred in the temperature range   may increase the dissolution abilities.
           between  ~360°C  and  ~480°C.  The  peak  value  of  the
           fastest mass loss occurred at ~430°C. Exceeding ~500°C,   3.2. Dimensional observation of scaffolds
           the mass of green parts was stable at ~55 wt. %.    The overall morphologies of the three types of scaffolds
               According to the TGA result, the debinding strategy   are shown in Figure 4A. The upper and lower rows of
           was determined, as shown in Figure 2D. In the temperature   scaffolds  were  the  green  parts  and  final  sintered  HA
           range between ~270°C and ~500°C, the heating rate was   ceramics,  respectively.  The  dimensional  difference
           set as 0.15°C/min. Three hours were held at the highest   revealed the linear shrinkage of the scaffolds during the
           speed  of  the  decomposition  to  provide  sufficient  time   thermal treatment. Form the green part to the sintered part,

           202                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1
   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221