Page 60 - IJB-8-3
P. 60

Additive Manufacturing of Bone Scaffolds
           10.  Leong K, Chua CK, Sudarmadji N, et al., 2008, Engineering   Scaffolds  with  Helical  Architectures  for  Breast  Tissue
               Functionally Graded Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. J Mech   Engineering. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 16:291–305.
               Behav Biomed Mater, 1:140–52.                   25.  Zhang XY, Fang G, Zhou J, 2017, Additively Manufactured
           11.  Lv Y, Wang B, Liu G, et al., 2021, Metal Material, Properties   Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering and the Prediction of
               and  Design  Methods  of  Porous  Biomedical  Scaffolds  for   their Mechanical Behavior: A Review. Materials, 10:50.
               Additive Manufacturing: A Review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol,   26.  Yang J, Gao H, Zhang D, et al., 2022, Static Compressive
               9:194.                                              Behavior  and  Material  Failure  Mechanism  of  Trabecular
           12.  Wong  KV,  Hernandez  A,  2012,  A  Review  of  Additive   Tantalum Scaffolds Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion-
               Manufacturing. Int Sch Res Notices, 2012:208760.    based Additive Manufacturing. Int J Bioprint, 8:438.
           13.  Rezaei  R,  Ravari  MR,  Badrossamay  M,  et  al.,  2017,   27.  Aihemaiti P, Jiang H, Aiyiti W, et al., 2022, Optimization of
               Mechanical Characterization and Finite Element Modeling of   3D  Printing  Parameters  of  Biodegradable  Polylactic Acid/
               Polylactic Acid BCC-Z Cellular Lattice Structures Fabricated   Hydroxyapatite Composite Bone Plates. Int J Bioprint, 8:490.
               by Fused Deposition Modeling. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C,   28.  Chao  L,  Jiao  C,  Liang  H,  et al.,  2021,  Analysis  of
               231:1995–2004.                                      Mechanical Properties and Permeability of Trabecular-Like
           14.  Schaedler  TA,  Carter  WB,  2016,  Architected  Cellular   Porous  Scaffold  by Additive  Manufacturing.  Front Bioeng
               Materials. Ann Rev Mater Res, 46:187–210.           Biotechnol, 9:779854.
           15.  Brighenti R, Cosma MP, Marsavina L, et al., 2021, Laser-  29.  Farina E, Gastaldi D, Baino F, et al., 2021, Micro Computed
               based  Additively  Manufactured  Polymers:  A  Review  on   Tomography  Based  Finite  Element  Models  for  Elastic  and
               Processes and Mechanical Models. J Mater Sci, 56:961–98.  Strength Properties of 3D Printed Glass Scaffolds. Acta Mech
           16.  Moshki A, Hajighasemi MR, Atai AA, et al., 2022, Optimal   Sinica, 37:292–306.
               Design of 3D Architected Porous/Nonporous Microstructures   30.  Askari E, Cengiz IF, Alves JL, et al., 2020, Micro-CT Based
               of  Multifunctional  Multiphase  Composites  for  Maximized   Finite Element Modelling and Experimental Characterization
               Thermomechanical Properties. Comput Mech, 69:979-96.  of the Compressive Mechanical Properties of 3-D Zirconia
           17.  Jebellat E, Baniassadi M, Moshki A, et al., 2020, Numerical   Scaffolds  for  Bone  Tissue  Engineering.  J  Mech Behav
               Investigation  of  Smart  Auxetic  Three-dimensional  Meta-  Biomed Mater, 102:103516.
               structures Based on Shape Memory Polymers Via Topology   31.  Castro A, Ruben RB, Gonçalves SB, et al., 2019, Numerical
               Optimization. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, 31:1838–52.  and Experimental Evaluation of TPMS Gyroid Scaffolds for
           18.  Noroozi R, Bodaghi M, Jafari H, et al., 2020, Shape-adaptive   Bone Tissue Engineering. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed
               Metastructures  with  Variable  Bandgap  Regions  by  4D   Eng, 22:567–73.
               Printing. Polymers, 12:519.                     32.  Castro AP, Santos JE, Pires T, et al., 2020, Micromechanical
           19.  Soltani A, Noroozi R, Bodaghi M, et al., 2020, 3D Printing   Behavior of TPMS Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.
               on-water  Sports  Boards  with  Bio-inspired  Core  Designs.   Macromol Mater Eng, 305:2000487.
               Polymers, 12:250.                               33.  Khan SZ, Masoodb SH, Ibrahima E, et al., 2019, Compressive
           20.  Bodaghi  M,  Noroozi  R,  Zolfagharian  A,  et  al.,  2019,  4D   Behaviour  of  Neovius  Triply  Periodic  Minimal  Surface
               Printing Self-morphing Structures. Materials, 12:1353.  Cellular  Structure  Manufactured  by  Fused  Deposition
           21.  Knight A, 2015, Cancer Patient Receives 3D Printed Ribs in   Modelling. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 14:360–70.
               Worldfirst Surgery.                             34.  Liang H, Wang Y, Chen S, et al., 2022, Nano-Hydroxyapatite
           22.  Ali D, Ozalp M, Blanquer SB, et al., 2020, Permeability and   Bone Scaffolds with Different Porous Structures Processed
               Fluid Flow-induced Wall Shear Stress in Bone Scaffolds with   by Digital Light Processing 3D Printing. Int J Bioprint, 8:502.
               TPMS  and  Lattice  Architectures:  A  CFD  Analysis.  Eur  J   35.  Chen H, Han Q, Wang C, et al., 2020, Porous Scaffold Design
               Mech B Fluids, 79:376–85.                           for Additive Manufacturing in Orthopedics: A Review. Front
           23.  Jiang  H, Aihemaiti  P, Aiyiti W,  et al.,  2021.  Study  Of  the   Bioeng Biotechnol, 8:609.
               Compression  Behaviours  of  3D-printed  PEEK/CFR-PEEK   36.  Karcher H, Polthier K, 1996, Construction of Triply Periodic
               Sandwich  Composite  Structures.  Virtual  Phys  Prototyp,   Minimal  Surfaces.  Philos Trans R Soc London Series  A,
               2021: 138–55.                                       354:2077–104.
           24.  Meng Z, He J, Li D, 2021, Additive Manufacturing and Large   37.  Vijayavenkataraman  S,  Zhang  L,  Zhang  S,  et al.,  2018,
               Deformation Responses of Highly-porous Polycaprolactone   Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces Sheet Scaffolds for Tissue

           52                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65