Page 131 - IJB-9-1
P. 131

International Journal of Bioprinting                     Fabrication of 3D breast tumor model for drug screening





































            Figure 8. Cell viability, distribution, and growth of 4T1 cells in the Gel/SA/dECM hybrid scaffolds and 2D culture condition were both investigated. Fluo-
            rescence staining was performed on the scaffolds and cells at 1 d (A), 4 d (B), and 7 d (C), and the growth of 4T1 on the scaffold was observed with confocal
            laser microscope. Green: live; red: dead; white arrows: cell colonies or tumor spheres (scale bars: 500 μm). (D) Viability of 4T1 grown on scaffolds evaluated
            by CCK-8 kit. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 represent significant difference between two groups.
            inoculated in this experiment. In general, the number   In order to explore the morphology of 4T1 on the
            of cells on 6G3S1d scaffold was the highest, and the   scaffold, SEM was used to observe 4T1, and the results
            proliferation was the fastest, which was consistent with the   were shown in Figure 9. It could be found that on 1 d, no
            growth of L929.                                    large-scale cell cluster was formed on the scaffolds, and
                                                               only a few cells were scattered at the edges and corners
               Figure 8D presented the results of quantitative test of
            4T1 viability evaluated by CCK-8 kit. On 1 d, the viability of   of the scaffolds. The long spindle shape of cells could be
                                                               clearly observed. On 4 d, the cells proliferated rapidly, and
            three groups was similar, but the difference of viability also   a large number of cells gathered and grew. The cells shrank
            became more significant with time. Similar to the L929 cells,   a little, but the boundary of cell was clear. At this point,
            4T1  cells  on  6G3S1d  also  showed  the  highest  viability  in   tumor spheres have appeared on the scaffolds. The cells
            three groups, which was consistent with fluorescence staining   cultured for 7 d had better proliferation rate than the cells
            results. Compared with the CCK-8 results of L929, 4T1   cultured in the first few days. Besides the corners of the
            showed higher viability as culture time increased, because   scaffolds, a large number of cells could also be observed
            4T1 is a highly aggressive tumor cell and therefore shows   on the edge of the main parts of the scaffolds, which were
            higher viability than normal cells. In addition, compared with   connected together and distributed in sheets. In addition,
            L929, the difference of 4T1 activity in each group was still   the size of tumor spheres formed in some areas on the
            very significant on 7 d, indicating that the scaffold was not   scaffolds ranged from 100 μm to 200 μm. The results
            full of cells at this time, which was also consistent with the   revealed the effective adhesion, invasion, proliferation, and
            fluorescence staining results of the two cell lines. Similar to   tumorigenicity of the 4T1 cells on these hybrid scaffolds,
            L929, the proliferation rate of cells on the scaffold was slower   which also could maintain good cell morphology.
            than that in the 2D environment, which was similarly reported
                              [69]
            by Mahmoudzadeh et al. . Cells in the 3D environment were
            not able to get as much oxygen and nutrients as those in the   3.7. Infiltration of 4T1 on scaffolds
            2D environment and formed vascular networks before they   In order to explore the distribution of 4T1 cells in the
            could proliferate rapidly, leading to a slower proliferation rate   scaffolds, laser confocal microscope was used to scan the
            than in the 2D group.                              scaffolds along the  Z-axis to generate 3D fluorescence


            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                        123                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.630
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136