Page 427 - IJB-9-2
P. 427

International Journal of Bioprinting                           Design and 3D printing of TPMS breast scaffolds


            of our knowledge, this is the first work that ensures the   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            appropriate mechanical properties, permeability, and good
            biocompatibility of breast scaffolds simultaneously.  Not applicable.

            4. Conclusions                                     Consent for publication
                                                               Not applicable.
            In this study, we successfully designed and fabricated a
            geometrically-new scaffold, featuring TPMS and multiple   Availability of data
            parallel channels, possessing appropriate mechanical
            properties and permeability similar to those of the natural   Not applicable.
            breast tissue. In terms of mechanical properties, the TPMS   References
            scaffold exhibits low elastic modulus (0.2–0.83 MPa) which
            matches that of breast tissue, and shows excellent stability   1.   Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram S, et al., 2018, Global cancer
            simultaneously. In addition, the scaffold possesses a 35%   statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and
            strain energy absorption window during compression,   mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.  CA
            and it also possesses good rebound characteristics. In   Cancer J Clin, 68: 394–424.
            terms of permeability, the designed TPMS scaffold has      https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
            smooth fluid flow and high fluid transport efficiency,   2.   Chen Y, Liu Y, Zhang J,  et al., 2021, Three-dimensional
            and the scaffold permeability is much higher than that of   bioprinting adipose tissue and mammary organoids feasible
            natural breast tissue, which allows for effective transport of   for artificial breast structure regeneration.  Mater Des,
            oxygen and nutrients and excretion of waste. In addition,   200: 109467.
            the hADSCs show high survival rate in the TPMS scaffold      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109467
            loaded with hydrogel, proving the good biocompatibility
            of the scaffold. This study solved the deficiency of high   3.   Malloy KM, Hilibrand S, 2002, Autograft versus allograft in
            elastic modulus of breast scaffold and improved the cell   degenerative cervical disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res,394: 27–38.
            growth environment in the scaffold. This breast scaffold   4.   Liao Z, Wang CH, Cui WL, 2016, Comparison of allograft
            is expected to improve the possibility and effectiveness of   and autograft in lumbar fusion for lumbar degenerative
            human breast reconstruction.                          diseases: A systematic review. J Invest Surg, 29: 373–382.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2016.1166534
            Acknowledgments
                                                               5.   Pouzet L, Hotton J, François C, 2022, Breast reconstruction
            None.                                                 with silicone prosthesis and acellular dermal matrix of
                                                                  porcine origin: Retrospective study of 84  cases.  Ann Chir
            Funding                                               Plast Esthét, 67: 133–139.
            The authors acknowledge the financial support received      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2022.03.001
            from the National Natural Science Foundation of China   6.   Lenne A, Defourny L, Lafosse A,  et al., 2016, Breast
            (52075158), the National Natural Science Foundation of   prosthesis infection and pets: A case report and review of
            Hunan Province (2021JJ30109), the Key R&D Program of   the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep, 22: 98–100.
            Hunan Province (2020SK2093), and the Clinical Research      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.03.034
            Center for Breast & Thyroid Disease Prevention in Hunan
            Province (2018SK4001).                             7.   González FM, Alarza FH, Aguirre MP, 2018, Lung
                                                                  siliconoma, a rare complication of breast prosthesis rupture.
            Conflict of interest                                  Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed), 54: 580–581.
            The authors declare that they have no competing interests.     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2018.02.019
                                                               8.   Chen F, Ekinci A, Li L, et al., 2021, How do the printing
            Author contributions                                  parameters of fused filament fabrication and structural
            Conceptualization: Xiaolong Zhu and Xiaoxiao Han      voids influence the degradation of biodegradable devices?
            Formal analysis: Xiaolong Zhu and Ning He             Acta Biomater, 136: 254–265.
            Investigation: Xiaolong Zhu, Hong Cao, and Feng Chen     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.020
            Methodology: Xiaolong Zhu and Ling Li              9.   Ekinci A, Gleadall A, Johnson AA, et al., 2021, Mechanical
            Writing – original draft: Xiaolong Zhu                and hydrolytic properties of thin polylactic acid films by
            Writing – review & editing:  Feng  Chen,  Hong  Cao,  and   fused filament fabrication.  J  Mech Behav Biomed Mater,
               Xiaoxiao Han                                       114: 104217.


            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023)                        419                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.685
   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432