Page 429 - IJB-9-2

International Journal of Bioprinting Design and 3D printing of TPMS breast scaffolds

engineering. Mater Des, 189: 108508. manufactured metallic porous biomaterials based on
minimal surfaces: A unique combination of topological,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108508
mechanical, and mass transport properties. Acta Biomater,
33. Jain S, Yassin MA, Fuoco T, et al., 2021, Understanding 53: 572–584.
of how the properties of medical grade lactide based https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.024
copolymer scaffolds influence adipose tissue regeneration:
Sterilization and a systematic in vitro assessment. Mater Sci 42. Ma S, Tang Q, Feng Q, et al., 2019, Mechanical behaviours
Eng C, 124: 112020. and mass transport properties of bone-mimicking scaffolds
consisted of gyroid structures manufactured using selective
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112020
laser melting. J Mechan Behav Biomed Mater, 93: 158–169.
34. Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, et al., 1998, Elastic https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.01.023
moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression.
Ultrasonic Imaging, 20: 260–274. 43. Al-Ketan O, Al-Rub RK, 2021, MSLattice: A free software
for generating uniform and graded lattices based on triply
https://doi.org/10.1177/016173469802000403 periodic minimal surfaces. Mater Des Processing Commun,
35. Umesh V, Rape AD, Ulrich TA, et al., 2014, 3: e205.
Microenvironmental stiffness enhances glioma cell https://doi.org/10.1002/mdp2.205
proliferation by stimulating epidermal growth factor
receptor signaling. PLoS One, 9: 101771. 44. Farazin A, Aghdam HA, Motififard M, et al., 2019, A
polycaprolactone bio-nanocomposite bone substitute
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101771 fabricated for femoral fracture approaches: Molecular
36. Hla C, Aa A, May B, et al., Computational and experimental dynamic and micro-mechanical investigation.
characterization of 3D-printed PCL structures toward J Nanoanalysis, 6: 172–184.
the design of soft biological tissue scaffolds. Mater Des, 45. Williams JM, Adewunmi A, Schek RM, et al., 2005, Bone
188: 108488. tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108488 fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials,
23: 4817–4827.
37. Zhou MR, Hou JF, Zhang G, et al., 2019, Tuning the
mechanics of 3D-printed scaffolds by crystal lattice- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.057
like structural design for breast tissue engineering. 46. Lu L, Zhang Q, Wootton DM, et al., 2014, Mechanical study
Biofabrication, 12: 15023–15023. of polycaprolactone-hydroxyapatite porous scaffolds created
38. Chhaya MP, Melchels FP, Holzapfel BM, et al., 2015, by porogen-based solid freeform fabrication method. J Appl
Sustained regeneration of high-volume adipose tissue for Biomater Funct Mater, 12: 145.
breast reconstruction using computer aided design and https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000163
biomanufacturing. Biomaterials, 52: 551–560.
47. Guyton AC, Scheel K, Murphree D, 1996, Interstitial fluid
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.025 pressure: III. Its effect on resistance to tissue fluid mobility.
39. Baptista R, Guedes M, Pereira MF, et al., 2020, On the effect of Circ Res, 19: 412–419.
design and fabrication parameters on mechanical performance https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.19.2.412
of 3D printed PLA scaffolds. Bioprinting, 20: e00096.
48. Reddy NP, Cochran G, 1981, Interstitial fluid flow as a factor
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00096 in decubitus ulcer formation. J Biomech, 14: 879–881.
40. Meng ZJ, He JK, Li DC, 2021, Additive manufacturing https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(81)90015-4
and large deformation responses of highly-porous 49. Chang KH, Liao HT, Chen JP, 2013, Preparation and
polycaprolactone scaffolds with helical architectures for characterization of gelation/hyaluronic acid cryogels for
breast tissue engineering. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 16: 291–305.
adipose tissue engineering: In vitro and in vivo studies. Acta
https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2021.1930069 Biomater, 9: 9012–9026.
41. Bobbert FS, Lietaert K, Eftekhari AA, et al. Additively https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.046

Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023) 421 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.685