Page 244 - IJB-9-3

International Journal of Bioprinting Biomaterials for vascularized and innervated tissue regeneration

126. Li T, Hou J, Wang L, et al., 2022, Bioprinted anisotropic 134. Choi Y-J, Jun Y-J, Kim D Y, et al., 2019, A 3D cell printed
scaffolds with fast stress relaxation bioink for engineering muscle construct with tissue-derived bioink for the
3D skeletal muscle and repairing volumetric muscle loss. treatment of volumetric muscle loss. Biomaterials, 206:
Acta Biomater, 156:21–36’. 160–169.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.037 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.03.036
127. Hwangbo H, Lee H, Jin E-J, et al., 2022, Bio-printing of 135. Qazi TH, Mooney DJ, Pumberger M, et al., 2015,
aligned GelMa-based cell-laden structure for muscle tissue Biomaterials based strategies for skeletal muscle tissue
regeneration. Bioact Mater, 8:57–70. engineering: Existing technologies and future trends.
Biomaterials, 53:502–521.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.031
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.110
128. Kim W, Lee H, Lee C K, et al., 2021, A bioprinting process
supplemented with in situ electrical stimulation directly 136. Lee H, Kim W, Lee J, et al., 2021, Self-aligned myofibers
induces significant myotube formation and myogenesis. Adv in 3D bioprinted extracellular matrix-based construct
Funct Mater, 31(51):2105170. accelerate skeletal muscle function restoration. Appl Phys
Rev, 8(2):021405.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202105170
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0039639
129. Panayi AC, Smit L, Hays N, et al., 2020, A porous collagen-GAG
scaffold promotes muscle regeneration following volumetric 137. Ostrovidov S, Salehi S, Costantini M, et al., 2019, 3D
muscle loss injury. Wound Repair Regen, 28(1):61–74. bioprinting in skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Small,
15(24):1805530.
https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12768
https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201805530
130. Zhang Z, Klausen LH, Chen M, et al., 2018, Electroactive
scaffolds for neurogenesis and myogenesis: graphene-based 138. Gao G, Cui X, 2016, Three-dimensional bioprinting in
nanomaterials. Small, 14(48):1801983. tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biotech Lett,
38(2):203–211.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201801983
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-015-1975-1
131. Quint JP, Mostafavi A, Endo Y, et al., 2021, In vivo printing
of nanoenabled scaffolds for the treatment of skeletal muscle 139. Kim JH, Kim I, Seol Y-J, et al., 2020, Neural cell integration
injuries. Adv Healthc Mater, 10(10):2002152. into 3D bioprinted skeletal muscle constructs accelerates
restoration of muscle function. Nat Commun, 11(1):1025.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202002152
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14930-9
132. Said SS, Yin H, Elfarnawany M, et al., 2019, Fortifying
angiogenesis in ischemic muscle with FGF9-loaded 140. Mi J, Xu J-K, Yao Z, et al., 2022, Implantable electrical
electrospun poly(ester amide) fibers. Adv Healthc Mater, stimulation at dorsal root ganglions accelerates osteoporotic
8(8):1801294. fracture healing via calcitonin gene-related peptide. Adv Sci,
9(1):2103005.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801294
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202103005
133. Gholobova D, Terrie L, Gerard M, et al., 2020, Vascularization
of tissue-engineered skeletal muscle constructs. Biomaterials,
235:119708.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119708

Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023) 236 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.706