Page 252 - IJB-9-3
P. 252

International Journal of Bioprinting                               Multi-material bioprinting with OCT imaging









































            Figure 4. Printing path and the printing process for different models. (A) Printing path. (B) The printing process, where 1 refers to nozzle 1 and 2 refers to
            nozzle 2; the process of the first printing method is 1-2-3-4. (C) The printing process, where 1 refers to nozzle 1 and 2 refers to nozzle 2; and the process
            of the second printing method is 1-2-3-4.

                 (i.e., pressure and speed) with the best stability are   0.3 Mpa. Meanwhile, the filament size of the silica gel-W
                 obtained with target filament metrics.        (d1) and silica gel-B (d2) could be obtained as 0.42 mm
             (ii)  Step 2: The trajectory and connection strategy for   and 0.26 mm, respectively. The printing path shown in
                 each nozzle is designed.                      Figure 4A was adopted in the experiment. Nozzle 1 and
                                                               nozzle  2  were  loaded  with  silica  gel-B  and  silica  gel-W,
             (iii)  Step 3: A 1-layer trajectory is printed, and connection   respectively.
                 areas are evaluated from OCT data.
                                                                  Before  the  optimization  of  the  printing  path  and
             (iv)  Step 4:  nozzle control parameters (i.e., AET and   printing parameters, obvious defects were observed in the
                 ATEP) are optimized for each nozzle to improve   printing results, as shown in colored boxes in  Figure  6,
                 connection performance.                       such as the changing of the filament size at the corner,

             (v)  Step 5: Printing with optimal parameters is   the over-extrusion at intermediate connection area, and
                 performed.                                    the over- or under-extrusion of the two materials at the
                                                               connection point. The printing path was further optimized
                                                               to balance the filament sizes at the corners, and the design
            3. Results                                         scheme was illustrated in Figure 7A. The solid line denoted
            3.1. Experiment of optimizing printing path        the printing path for silica gel-B, and the dotted line
            In the first experiment, the layer thickness of the two   denotes the printing path for silica gel-W. The area in the
            materials (H) was designed to be consistent with a nominal   box was the connection area between the middle corners
            value of 0.28 mm. Based on the printed structures of multi-  of the two materials, and the designed distance between
            material bioprinting matching, the printing parameters of   the two materials (dʹ) was 0.45 mm (dʹ = 0.7 * d1 + 0 + 0.6 *
            the two materials in the multi-material static model was   d2 = 0.45 mm). As the filament metrics of the printed
            selected. In detail, the printing parameters of silica gel-W   corners would change, the following pre-experiments were
            and  the  silica  gel-B  were  both  selected as  6  mm/s  and   performed on the parameter selection of the corners. To


            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023)                        244                          https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.707
   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257