Page 436 - IJB-9-4

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D bioprinting of artificial blood vessel

24. Syedain ZH, Prunty A, Li J, et al., 2021, Evaluation of the of gelatin-alginate composite bioink printability
probe burst test as a measure of strength for a biologically- using rheological parameters: A systematic approach.
engineered vascular graft. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, Biofabrication, 10: 034106.
119: 104527.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aacdc7
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104527 35. Zhang S, Li G, Man J, et al., 2020, Fabrication of microspheres
25. Konig G, McAllister TN, Dusserre N, et al., 2009, Mechanical from high-viscosity bioink using a novel microfluidic-based
properties of completely autologous human tissue 3D bioprinting nozzle. Micromachines (Basel), 11: 681.
engineered blood vessels compared to human saphenous https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11070681
vein and mammary artery. Biomaterials, 30: 1542–1550.
36. Skardal A, Zhang J, Prestwich GD, 2010, Bioprinting vessel-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.011 like constructs using hyaluronan hydrogels crosslinked with
26. Matthew JM, Richard PT, Yang NJ, et al., 2022, Bioengineering tetrahedral polyethylene glycol tetracrylates. Biomaterials,
artificial blood vessels from natural materials. Trends 31: 6173–6181.
Biotechnol, 40: 693–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.045
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.11.003 37. Liu W, Heinrich MA, Zhou Y, et al., 2017, Extrusion
27. Zandi N, Sani ES, Mostafavi E, et al., 2021, Nanoengineered bioprinting of shear-thinning gelatin methacryloyl bioinks.
shear-thinning and bioprintable hydrogel as a versatile Adv Healthc Mater, 6: 1601451.
platform for biomedical applications. Biomaterials, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601451
267: 120476.
38. Lim W, Kim GJ, Kim HW, et al., 2020, Kappa-carrageenan-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120476 based dual crosslinkable bioink for extrusion type
28. Yoneyama T, Ito M, Sugihara K, et al., 2000, Small diameter bioprinting. Polymers (Basel), 12: 2377.
vascular prosthesis with a nonthrombogenic phospholipid https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102377
polymer surface: Preliminary study of a new concept
for functioning in the absence of pseudo-or neointima 39. Colosi C, Shin SR, Manoharan V, et al., 2016, Microfluidic
formation. Artif Organs, 24: 23–28. bioprinting of heterogeneous 3D tissue constructs using
low‐viscosity bioink. Adv Mater, 28: 677–684.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1594.2000.06433.x
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503310
29. Garcia-Cruz MR, Postma A, Frith JE, et al., 2021, Printability
and bio-functionality of a shear thinning methacrylated 40. Zhou K, Sun Y, Yang J, et al., 2022, Hydrogels for 3D
xanthan-gelatin composite bioink. Biofabrication, embedded bioprinting: A focused review on bioinks and
13: 035023. support baths. J Mater Chem B, 10: 1897–1907.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abec2d https://doi.org/10.1039/d1tb02554f
30. Amorim PA, D’Ávila MA, Anand R, et al., 2021, Insights on 41. Hoch E, Tovar GE, Borchers K, 2014, Bioprinting of artificial
shear rheology of inks for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. blood vessels: current approaches towards a demanding
Bioprinting, 22: e00129. goal. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 46: 767–778.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00129 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu242
31. Bae M, Hwang DW, Ko MK, et al. 2021, Neural stem cell 42. Xing HA, Yz A, Ms A, et al., 2021, A highly biocompatible
delivery using brain-derived tissue-specific bioink for bio-ink for 3D hydrogel scaffolds fabrication in the presence
recovering from traumatic brain injury. Biofabrication, of living cells by two-photon polymerization. Eur Polym,
13: 044110. 153: 110505.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110505
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac293f
43. Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T, et al., 2014, The 3D
32. Diamantides N, Dugopolski C, Blahut E, et al., 2019, High
density cell seeding affects the rheology and printability of printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-
collagen bioinks. Biofabrication, 11: 045016. engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials,
35: 49–62.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab3524
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078
33. Xu C, Zhang M, Huang Y, et al., 2014, Study of droplet 44. Wang Z, Kumar H, Tian Z, et al., 2018, Visible light
formation process during drop-on-demand inkjetting of photoinitiation of cell-adhesive gelatin methacryloyl
living cell-laden bioink. Langmuir, 30: 9130–9138.
hydrogels for stereolithography 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl
https://doi.org/10.1021/la501430x Mater Interfaces, 10: 26859–26869.
34. Gao T, Gillispie GJ, Copus JS, et al., 2018, Optimization https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b06607

Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023) 428 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.740