Page 438 - IJB-9-4

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D bioprinting of artificial blood vessel

https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11091581 et al., 2021, Development, characterization and sterilisation
of nanocellulose-alginate-(hyaluronic acid)-bioinks and 3D
67. Stanton M, Samitier J, Sanchez SJ, 2015, Bioprinting of 3D
hydrogels. Lab Chip, 15: 3111–3115. bioprinted scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C
Mater Biol Appl, 126: 112160.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5LC90069G
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112160
68. Rees A, Powell LC, Chinga-Carrasco G, et al., 2015, 3D 78. Zhang T, Zhao W, Xiahou Z, et al., 2021, Bioink design for
Bioprinting of carboxymethylated-periodate oxidized extrusion-based bioprinting. Appl Mater Today, 25: 101227.
nanocellulose constructs for wound dressing applications.
Biomed Res Int, 2015: 925757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101227
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/925757 79. Petta D, D’Amora U, Ambrosio L, et al. 2020, Hyaluronic acid
as a bioink for extrusion-based 3D printing. Biofabrication,
69. Sakai T, Matsunaga T, Yamamoto Y, et al., 2008, Design 12: 032001.
and fabrication of a high-strength hydrogel with ideally
homogeneous network structure from tetrahedron-like https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab8752
macromonomers. Macromolecules, 41: 5379–5384. 80. Oliveira H, Médina C, Stachowicz ML, et al., 2021,
https://doi.org/10.1021/ma800476x Extracellular matrix (ECM)-derived bioinks designed
to foster vasculogenesis and neurite outgrowth:
70. Kačarević ŽP, Rider PM, Alkildani S, et al., 2018, An Characterization and bioprinting. Bioprinting, 22: e00134.
introduction to 3D bioprinting: Possibilities, challenges and
future aspects. Materials (Basel), 11: 2199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00134
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112199 81. Noh I, Kim N, Tran HN, et al., 2019, 3D printable hyaluronic
acid-based hydrogel for its potential application as a bioink
71. Kim P, Yuan A, Nam KH, et al., 2014, Fabrication of in tissue engineering. Biomater Res, 23: 3.
poly(ethylene glycol): gelatin methacrylate composite
nanostructures with tunable stiffness and degradation for https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0152-8
vascular tissue engineering. Biofabrication, 6: 024112. 82. Xu L, Varkey M, Jorgensen A, et al., 2020, Bioprinting small
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024112 diameter blood vessel constructs with an endothelial and
smooth muscle cell bilayer in a single step. Biofabrication,
72. Li X, Liu X, Josey B, et al., 2014, Short laminin peptide for 12: 045012.
improved neural stem cell growth. Stem Cell Transl Med,
3: 662–670. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba2b6
https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2013-0015 83. Zhu W, Qu X, Zhu J, et al., 2017, Direct 3D bioprinting
of prevascularized tissue constructs with complex
73. Yamaoka T, Tabata Y, Ikada Y, 1994, Distribution and tissue microarchitecture. Biomaterials, 124: 106–1015.
uptake of poly(ethylene glycol) with different molecular
weights after intravenous administration to mice. J Pharm https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.042
Sci, 83: 601–606. 84. Zhao L, Lee VK, Yoo SS, et al., 2012, The integration of
https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600830432 3-D cell printing and mesoscopic fluorescence molecular
tomography of vascular constructs within thick hydrogel
74. Peak CW, Singh KA, Adlouni M, et al, 2019, Printing scaffolds. Biomaterials, 33: 5325–5332.
therapeutic proteins in 3D using nanoengineered bioink
to control and direct cell migration. Adv Healthc Mater, 8: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.004
e1801553. 85. Thomas A, Orellano I, Lam T, et al., 2020, Vascular
bioprinting with enzymatically degradable bioinks via
https://doi.org10.1002/adhm.201801553
multi-material projection-based stereolithography. Acta
75. Choi YJ, Park H, Ha DH, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting of in Biomater, 117: 121–132.
vitro models using hydrogel-based bioinks. Polymers (Basel),
13: 366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.033
86. Lu D, Zeng Z, Geng Z, et al., 2022, Macroporous
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030366
methacrylated hyaluronic acid hydrogel with different pore
76. Thanh TN, Laowattanatham N, Ratanavaraporn J, et al., sizes for in vitro and in vivo evaluation of vascularization.
2022, Hyaluronic acid crosslinked with alginate hydrogel: Biomed Mater, 17: 025006.
A versatile and biocompatible bioink platform for tissue https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ac494b
engineering. Eur Polym J, 166: 111027.
87. Lee J, Lee SH, Kim BS, et al., 2018, Development and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111027
evaluation of hyaluronic acid-based hybrid bio-ink for
77. Lafuente-Merchan M, Ruiz-Alonso S, Espona-Noguera A, tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Regen Med, 15: 761–769.

Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023) 430 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.740