Page 196 - IJB-9-5
P. 196
International Journal of Bioprinting Functional materials of 3D bioprinting for wound healing
99. Han S, Wu J, 2022, Three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds as 110. Tan SH, Ngo ZH, Sci DB, et al., 2022, Recent advances in
powerful weapons for tumor immunotherapy. Bioact Mater, the design of three-dimensional and bioprinted scaffolds
17:300–319. for full-thickness wound healing. Tissue Eng. Part B, Rev,
28(1):160–181.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.020
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2020.0339
100. Bhar B, Chouhan D, Pai N, et al., 2021, Harnessing
multifaceted next-generation technologies for improved 111. Guillotin B, Souquet A, Catros S, et al., 2010, Laser assisted
skin wound healing. ACS Appl Biol Mater, 4(11):7738–7763. bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and
microscale organization. Biomaterials, 31(28):7250–7256.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c00880
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.055
101. Lee M, Rizzo R, Surman F, et al., 2020, Guiding lights:
Tissue bioprinting using photoactivated materials. Chem 112. Zhu W, Ma X, Gou M, et al., 2016, 3D printing of functional
Rev, 120(19):10950–11027. biomaterials for tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol,
40:103–112.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00077
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.014
102. Long J, Etxeberria AE, Nand AV, et al., 2019, A 3D printed
chitosan-pectin hydrogel wound dressing for lidocaine 113. Song Y, Chen X, Zhou J, et al., 2022, Research on performance
hydrochloride delivery. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, of passive heat supply tower based on the back propagation
104:109873. neural network. Energy, 250:123762.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109873 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123762
103. Park J, Wetzel I, Dreau D, et al., 2018, 3D miniaturization 114. Xu J, Zheng S, Hu X, et al., 2020, Advances in the research of
of human organs for drug discovery. Adv Healthc Mater, bioinks based on natural collagen, polysaccharide and their
7(2):1700551. derivatives for skin 3D bioprinting. Polymers, 12(6):1237.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700551 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12061237
104. Gudapati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I, 2016, A comprehensive 115. Chen A, Qu C, Shi Y, et al., 2020, Manufacturing strategies
review on droplet-based bioprinting: Past, present and for solid electrolyte in batteries. Front Energy Res, 8:571440.
future. Biomaterials, 102:20–42.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.571440
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.012
116. Antezana PE, Municoy S, Alvarez-Echazu MI, et al.,
105. Gao C, Lu C, Jian Z, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting for 2022, The 3D bioprinted scaffolds for wound healing.
fabricating artificial skin tissue. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, Pharmaceutics, 14(2):464.
208:112041.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020464
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112041
117. Augustine R, 2018, Skin bioprinting: A novel approach for
106. Kim JH, Yoo JJ, Lee SJ, 2016, Three-dimensional cell-based creating artificial skin from synthetic and natural building
bioprinting for soft tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Regen blocks. Prog Biomater, 7(2):77–92.
Med, 13(6):647–662.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-018-0087-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-016-0133-8
118. Cui X, Dean D, Ruggeri ZM, et al., 2010, Cell damage
107. Derakhshanfar S, Mbeleck R, Xu K, et al., 2018, 3D evaluation of thermal inkjet printed Chinese hamster ovary
bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: cells. Biotechnol Bioeng, 106(6):963–969.
A review of recent trends and advances. Bioact Mater,
3(2):144–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22762
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.008 119. Ostrovidov S, Salehi S, Costantini M, et al., 2019, 3D
bioprinting in skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Small,
108. Wang Y, Yuan X, Yao B, et al., 2022, Tailoring bioinks of 15(24):e1805530.
extrusion-based bioprinting for cutaneous wound healing.
Bioact Mater, 17:178–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201805530
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.024 120. Gao G, Cui X, 2016, Three-dimensional bioprinting in tissue
engineering and regenerative medicine. Biotechnol Lett,
109. Fairag R, Rosenzweig DH, Ramirez-Garcialuna JL, et al.,
2019, Three-dimensional printed polylactic acid scaffolds 38(2):203–211.
promote bone-like matrix deposition in vitro. ACS Appl https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-015-1975-1
Mater Interfaces, 11(17):15306–15315.
121. Boland T, Xu T, Damon B, et al., 2006, Application of inkjet
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b02502 printing to tissue engineering. Biotechnol J, 1(9):910–917.
Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 188 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.757

