Page 191 - IJB-9-5
P. 191

International Journal of Bioprinting                      Functional materials of 3D bioprinting for wound healing



            challenges facing wound healing materials are the further   metabolites in chitosan-based wound dressings: A review.
            development of multifunctional materials, the progress   Carbohydr Polym, 233:115839.
            of biological printing technology, and the construction of   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115839
            skin’s functional structure. In the future, we believe that   2.   Kus KJB, Ruiz ES, 2020, Wound dressings—A practical
            continuous advances in skin research, healing product   review. Curr Derm Rep, 9(4):298–308.
            design, material formulation, and printing technology
            can not only ease the preparation of new multifunctional   https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-020-00319-w
            wound healing materials but also lay a foundation for the   3.   Li R, Liu K, Huang X, et al., 2022, Bioactive materials promote
            clinical application of functional bionic skin. In the coming   wound healing through modulation of cell behaviors. Adv
            years, multifunctional, multimaterial, and multiscale   Sci (Weinh), 9(10):e2105152.
            manufacturing will be the focus in the research on 3D   https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202105152
            bioprinting of wound healing materials.
                                                               4.   Simoes D, Miguel SP, Ribeiro MP, et al., 2018, Recent
            Acknowledgments                                       advances on antimicrobial wound dressing: A review. Eur J
                                                                  Pharm Biopharm, 127:130–141.
            None.                                                 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.02.022

            Funding                                            5.   Zhang K, Wang Y, Wei Q, et al., 2021, Design and fabrication
                                                                  of sodium alginate/carboxymethyl cellulose sodium blend
            This work was supported by the National Natural Science   hydrogel for artificial skin. Gels, 7(3):115.
            Foundation of China (31670978/31971275), the Fok      https://doi.org/10.3390/gels7030115
            Ying Tung Education Foundation (132027), the State
            Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals (KF1111), and the   6.   Farahani M, Shafiee A, 2021, Wound healing: From passive
                                                                  to smart dressings. Adv Healthc Mater, 10(16):e2100477.
            Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
            (DUT21YG113/DUT22YG213/DUT22YG116).                   https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100477
                                                               7.   Wang F, Wang S, Nan L, et al., 2022, Conductive adhesive and
            Conflict of interest                                  antibacterial zwitterionic hydrogel dressing for therapy of full-
                                                                  thickness skin wounds. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 10:833887.
            The authors declare no conflict of interest.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.833887
            Author contributions                               8.   Katiyar S, Singh D, Kumari S, et al., 2022, Novel strategies
                                                                  for designing regenerative skin products for accelerated
            Conceptualization: Kedong Song, Huan Fang, Jie Xu     wound healing. 3 Biotech, 12(11):316.
            Project administration: Kedong Song, Hong Wang
            Supervision: Kedong Song, Yi Nie, Hong Wang, Bo Pan   https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-022-03331-y
            Visualization: Huan Fang, Jie Xu, Hailin Ma, Kedong Song  9.   Da LC, Huang YZ, Xie HQ, 2017, Progress in development
            Writing – original draft: Huan Fang, Jie Xu, Hailin Ma, Jiaqi   of bioderived materials for dermal wound healing.  Regen
               Liu, Erpai Xing                                    Biomater, 4(5):325–334.
            Writing – review & editing: Kedong Song, Yuen Yee Cheng,   https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbx025
               Huan Fang, Jie Xu, Jiaqi Liu
                                                               10.  Xu J, Fang H, Zheng S, et al., 2021, A biological functional
                                                                  hybrid scaffold based on decellularized extracellular
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            matrix/gelatin/chitosan with high biocompatibility and
            Not applicable.                                       antibacterial activity for skin tissue engineering. Int J Biol
                                                                  Macromol, 187:840–849.
            Consent for publication                               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.162
            Not applicable.                                    11.  Wang K, Wang J, Li L, et al., 2020, Novel nonreleasing
                                                                  antibacterial hydrogel dressing by a one-pot method. ACS
            Availability of data                                  Biomater Sci Eng, 6(2):1259–1268.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01812
            Not applicable.
                                                               12.  Guo Y, Huang J, Fang Y, et al., 2022, 1D, 2D, and 3D scaffolds
            References                                            promoting angiogenesis for enhanced wound healing. Chem
                                                                  Eng J, 437:134690.
            1.   Moeini A, Pedram P, Makvandi P,  et  al., 2020, Wound   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.134690
               healing and antimicrobial effect of active secondary


            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                        183                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.757
   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196