Page 276 - IJB-9-5
P. 276

International Journal of Bioprinting                      3D-printed scaffolds for TMJ fibrocartilage regeneration































            Figure 5. 3D-printed scaffolds for mandibular condylar fibrocartilage regeneration. (A) Iliac crest bone marrow packed into 3D-printed scaffold condylar
            head (left) and the scaffold well adapted to mandibular ramus (right). Reproduced with permission from Smith MH, Flanagan CL, Kemppainen JM,
            et al., Int J Med Robot, 3: 207–16 . (B) 3D-printed PCL porous scaffold with collar fixation fit (outlined in red) on 3D-printed pig mandible. Reprinted
                                 [84]
            from Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 132: 145–52, Abramowicz S, Crotts SJ, Hollister SJ, Tissue-engineered vascularized patient-specific
            temporomandibular joint reconstruction in a Yucatan pig model, © (2021), with permission from Elsevier . (C) Visual design (left) and real view (right)
                                                                               [85]
            of the hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffold and customized bone plates. Reproduced with permission from Ciocca L, Donati D, Fantini M et al., J Biomater Appl,
            28: 207–18 . (D) The assembly process and real view of the assembled composite scaffold (upper polymer phase and lower ceramic phase). Reproduced
                   [87]
            with permission from Schek R, Taboas J, Hollister S, et al., Orthod Craniofac Res, 8: 313–9 . (E–G) The gross images of PCL/HA scaffold (E) and PGA/
                                                                     [88]
            PLA scaffold (F) and the well-matched biphasic scaffold (G). Reprinted from J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 45: 855–61, Wang F, Hu Y, He D, et al., Regeneration
            of subcutaneous tissue-engineered mandibular condyle in nude mice, Copyright 2017, with permission from Elsevier .
                                                                                      [89]
            to the mandibular ramus (Figure 5A). At both the 1- and   titanium screw (Figure 5C). Four months after surgery, the
            3-month time points, the cartilaginous tissue was observed   histological evaluation showed that the regenerated dense
            along the articular surface. Nevertheless, the regenerated   fibrocartilage developed on the new articular bone and the
            cartilage was unevenly distributed on the condyle surface   osteochondral interface was on average 1.25-mm thick.
            and blended with a small amount of bony tissue. Another   Notably, several fractures in the material and fragments
            similar  study  reported  different  results.  Abramowicz    encapsulated by tissue were observed. Fractures of the
                [85]
            et al.  found that 6 months after implantation of   scaffold are detrimental to the stability of the scaffold during
            3D-printed PCL scaffolds coated with BMP-2 into the   TMJ movement. In addition, the fixation of the scaffold to
            mandibular condyle defect, no regenerated cartilage was   the condyle during implantation is of particular concern,
            observed in histologic evaluation (Figure 5B). Although   as  firm  primary  stability is crucial for osteoblastic and
            an ideal result for mandibular condylar fibrocartilage   chondroblastic activity.
            regeneration cannot be achieved so far, 3D-printed PCL   In 2005, Schek et al.  fabricated a biphasic PLA/HA
                                                                                  [88]
            scaffolds still have great potential in mandibular condylar   scaffold using an image-based design and indirect solid free-
            engineering as they are able to withstand early functional   form fabrication (Figure 5D). Human gingival fibroblasts
                                             [86]
            loading due to their mechanical property .
                                                               transduced with an adenovirus expressing BMP-7 and
               Some studies have successfully regenerated both   porcine knee joints chondrocytes were seeded into the lower
            fibrocartilage and the osteochondral interface in vivo using   ceramic phase and the upper polymeric phase, respectively.
            either monophasic or biphasic 3D-printed scaffolds (Table   After subcutaneous implantation into the mice for 4 weeks,
            3). In 2013, Ciocca et al.  fabricated porous HA scaffolds to   the regenerated cartilage, bone, and osteochondral interface
                              [87]
            replace the mandibular condyles in sheep. The HA-F70 (70   were observed in the biphasic scaffold. However, some small
            vol% total porosity) was selected as the scaffold material as   pockets of cartilage also occurred within the pores of the
            it had the highest compressive strength compared to that of   ceramic phase, suggesting that greater control of the spatial
            the other three types of HA materials. The customized plates   distribution of the regenerated tissue is required. In 2017, Wang
            fixed on the bone were used to fix the scaffolds with a single   et al.  further improved the component of the PLA/
                                                                   [89]

            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                        268                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.761
   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281