Page 280 - IJB-9-5
P. 280

International Journal of Bioprinting                      3D-printed scaffolds for TMJ fibrocartilage regeneration



            3.   Valesan LF, Da-Cas CD, Réus JC, et al., 2021, Prevalence of   14.  Trindade D, Cordeiro R, José HC,  et al., 2021, Biological
               temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review   treatments for temporomandibular joint disc disorders:
               and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig,  25(2): 441–53  Strategies in tissue engineering. Biomolecules, 11(7): 933.
               http://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03710-w          http://doi.org/10.3390/biom11070933
            4.   Tanaka E, Detamore MS, Mercuri LG, 2008, Degenerative   15.  Perera K, Ivone R, Natekin E, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinted
               disorders of the temporomandibular joint: Etiology,   implants for cartilage repair in intervertebral discs and knee
               diagnosis, and treatment. J Dent Res, 87(4): 296–307  menisci. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 9: 754113.
               http://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700406          http://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.754113
            5.   Fang L, Ye Y, Tan X, et al., 2021, Overloading stress-induced   16.  Doyle SE, Snow F, Duchi S, et al., 2021, 3D printed
               progressive degeneration and self-repair in condylar   multiphasic scaffolds for osteochondral repair: Challenges
               cartilage. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1503(1): 72–87        and opportunities. Int J Mol Sci, 22(22): 12420.
                                                                  http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212420
               http://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14606
                                                               17.  Wang S, Zhao S, Yu J, et al., 2022, Advances in translational
            6.   Lee KS, Kwak HJ, Oh JM, et al., 2020, Automated detection   3D printing for cartilage, bone, and osteochondral tissue
               of TMJ osteoarthritis based on artificial intelligence. J Dent   engineering. Small, 18(36): e2201869.
               Res, 99(12): 1363–7
                                                                  http://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202201869
               http://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520936950
                                                               18.  McMillan  A, McMillan  N,  Gupta  N, et al.,  2023,  3D
            7.   Wang XD, Zhang JN, Gan YH, et al., 2015, Current   bioprinting in otolaryngology: A review. Adv Healthc Mater,
               understanding of pathogenesis and treatment of TMJ   e2203268.
               osteoarthritis. J Dent Res, 94(5): 666–73
                                                                  http://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202203268
               http://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515574770
                                                               19.  Yang Z, Yi P, Liu Z, et al., 2022, Stem cell-laden hydrogel-
            8.   Resnick CM, 2018, Temporomandibular joint reconstruction   based 3D bioprinting for bone and cartilage tissue
               in the growing child. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am,   engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 10: 865770.
               30(1): 109–21
                                                                  http://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.865770
               http://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2017.08.006
                                                               20.  Zub  K,  Hoeppener S,  Schubert  US,  2022,  Inkjet  printing
            9.   Haene R, Qamirani E, Story RA, et al., 2012, Intermediate   and 3D printing strategies for biosensing, analytical, and
               outcomes of fresh talar osteochondral allografts for   diagnostic applications. Adv Mater, 34(31): e2105015.
               treatment of large osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone   http://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202105015
               Joint Surg Am, 94(12): 1105–10
                                                               21.  Gudapati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I, 2016, A comprehensive
               http://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.J.02010                review on droplet-based bioprinting: Past, present and
            10.  Johnson  NR,  Roberts  MJ,  Doi  SA, et al.,  2017,  Total   future. Biomaterials, 102: 20–42.
               temporomandibular joint replacement prostheses: A   http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.012
               systematic review and bias-adjusted meta-analysis. Int J Oral
               Maxillofac Surg, 46(1): 86–92                   22.  Sohrabi S, Liu Y, 2018, Modeling thermal inkjet and cell
                                                                  printing process using modified pseudopotential and
               http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.08.022          thermal lattice Boltzmann methods.  Phys Rev E, 97(3–1):
            11.  Armiento AR, Stoddart MJ, Alini M, et al., 2018, Biomaterials   033105.
               for articular cartilage tissue engineering: Learning from   http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.033105
               biology. Acta Biomater, 65: 1–20.
                                                               23.  Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K, et al., 2016, 3D bioprinting for
               http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.021        engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv, 34(4): 422–34.
            12.  O’Shea DG, Curtin CM, O’Brien FJ, 2022, Articulation   http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011
               inspired by nature: A review of biomimetic and biologically   24.  Guo Q, Su X, Zhang X, et al., 2021, A review on acoustic
               active 3D printed scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering.   droplet ejection technology and system. Soft Matter, 17(11):
               Biomater Sci, 10(10): 2462–83.                     3010–21.
               http://doi.org/10.1039/d1bm01540k                  http://doi.org/10.1039/d0sm02193h
            13.  Van Bellinghen X, Idoux-Gillet Y, Pugliano M, et al., 2018,   25.  Derakhshanfar S, Mbeleck R, Xu K, et al., 2018, 3D bioprinting
               Temporomandibular joint regenerative medicine. Int J Mol   for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: A review of
               Sci, 19(2): 446.                                   recent trends and advances. Bioact Mater, 3(2): 144–56.
               http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020446                http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.008


            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                        272                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.761
   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285