Page 117 - IJB-9-6

International Journal of Bioprinting Affordable temperature-controlled bioprinter

24. Liu F, Liu C, Chen Q, et al., 2018, Progress in organ 3D 34. Gillispie GJ, Han A, Uzun-Per M, et al., 2020, The influence
bioprinting. Int J Bioprint, 4(1):1–15. of printing parameters and cell density on bioink printing
outcomes. Tissue Eng Part A, 26(23–24):1349–1358.
https//doi.org/10.18063/IJB.v4i1.128
https//doi.org/10.1089/TEN.TEA.2020.0210
25. Liu W, Heinrich MA, Zhou Y, et al., 2017, Extrusion
bioprinting of shear-thinning gelatin methacryloyl bioinks. 35. Tavares-Negrete JA, Aceves-Colin AE, Rivera-Flores DC, et
Adv Healthc Mater, 6(12):1601451. al., 2021, Three-dimensional printing using a maize protein:
Zein-based inks in biomedical applications. ACS Biomater
https//doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601451
Sci Eng, 7(8):3964–3979.
26. Maciel BR, Baki K, Oelschlaeger C, et al., 2022, The influence https//doi.org/10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.1C00544/
of rheological and wetting properties of hydrogel-based SUPPL_FILE/AB1C00544_SI_004.MOV
bio-inks on extrusion-based bioprinting. Chem Ing Tech,
94(3):393–401. 36. Ioannidis K, Danalatos RI, Champeris Tsaniras S, et al.,
2020, A custom ultra-low-cost 3D bioprinter supports cell
https//doi.org/10.1002/CITE.202100139 growth and differentiation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 8:1279.
27. Talluri DJS, Nguyen HT, Avazmohammadi R, et al., 2022, https//doi.org/10.3389/FBIOE.2020.580889/BIBTEX
Ink rheology regulates stability of bioprinted strands. J
Biomech Eng, 144(7):074503. 37. Bolívar-Monsalve EJ, Ceballos‐González CF, Chávez‐
Madero C, et al., 2022, One-step bioprinting of multi-
https//doi.org/10.1115/1.4053404/1131087 channel hydrogel filaments using chaotic advection:
28. Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, et al., 2015, Fabrication of pre-vascularized muscle-like tissues. Adv
Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin Healthc Mater, 11(24):2200448.
methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials, 73:254–271. https//doi.org/10.1002/ADHM.202200448
https//doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 38. Kolesky DB, Truby RL, Gladman AS, et al., 2014, 3D
29. Bolívar-Monsalve EJ, Ceballos-González CF, Borrayo- bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue
Montaño KI, et al., 2021, Continuous chaotic bioprinting of constructs. Adv Mater, 26(19):3124–3130.
skeletal muscle-like constructs. Bioprinting, 21:e00125. https//doi.org/10.1002/ADMA.201305506
https//doi.org/10.1016/J.BPRINT.2020.E00125 39. Jalaal M, Cottrell G, Balmforth N, et al., 2016, On the
30. Celikkin N, Mastrogiacomo S, Dou W, et al., 2022, In vitro rheology of Pluronic F127 aqueous solutions. J Rheol (NY),
and in vivo assessment of a 3D printable gelatin methacrylate 61(1):139.
hydrogel for bone regeneration applications. J Biomed Mater https//doi.org/10.1122/1.4971992
Res Part B Appl Biomater, 110(9):2133–2145.
40. Lenaerts V, Triqueneaux C, Quartern M, et al., 1987,
https//doi.org/10.1002/JBM.B.35067 Temperature-dependent rheological behavior of Pluronic
31. Ying G, Jiang N, Yu C, et al., 2018, Three-dimensional F-127 aqueous solutions. Int J Pharm, 39(1–2):121–127.
bioprinting of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA). Bio-Design https//doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(87)90206-7
Manuf, 1(4):215–224.
41. Xu C, Zhang M, Huang Y, et al., 2014, Study of droplet
https//doi.org/10.1007/s42242-018-0028-8 formation process during drop-on-demand inkjetting of
32. West J, Kuk G, 2016, The complementarity of openness: How living cell-laden bioink. Langmuir, 30(30):9130–9138.
MakerBot leveraged Thingiverse in 3D printing. Technol https//doi.org/10.1021/la501430x
Forecast Soc Change, 102:169–181.
42. Schwartz R, Malpica M, Thompson GL, et al., 2020, Cell
https//doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2015.07.025 encapsulation in gelatin bioink impairs 3D bioprinting
33. Magrisso S, Zoran A, 2019, Digital joinery for hybrid resolution. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 103:103524.
carpentry. Lect Notes Civ Eng, 24:441–461. https//doi.org/10.1016/J.JMBBM.2019.103524
https//doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03676-8_16

Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 109 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0244