Page 557 - IJB-9-6
P. 557

International Journal of Bioprinting                            3D printing of PCL-ceramic composite scaffolds


               the applications of metallic and ceramic biomaterials. In:   21.  Desai S, Harrison B, 2010, Direct-writing of biomedia
               Bio-Materials and Prototyping Applications in Medicine.   for drug delivery and tissue regeneration. In: Printed
               Germany: Springer. p1–17.                          Biomaterials:  Novel  Processing  and  Modeling  Techniques
                                                                  for Medicine and Surgery. Germany: Springer Verlag.
            8.   Desai S, Shankar MR, 2021, Emerging trends in polymers,
               composites, and nano biomaterial applications. In: Bio-  22.  Desai S, Perkins J, Harrison BS, et al., 2010, Understanding
               Materials and Prototyping Applications in Medicine.   release kinetics of biopolymer drug delivery microcapsules
               Germany: Springer, p19–34.                         for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng B, 168: 127–131.
            9.   Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, et al., 2004, Biomaterials      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2009.11.006
               Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine. San   23.  Desai S, Moore A, Harrison B, et al., 2008, Understanding
               Diego, California: Academic Press. p162–164.       microdroplet formations for biomedical applications. In:
            10.  Hanker JS, Giammara BL, 1988, Biomaterials and biomedical   ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and
               devices. Science, 242: 885–892.                    Exposition. New York, United States: ASME. p1–4.
               https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3055300.        24.  Abedalwafa M, Wang F, Wang L, et al., 2013, Biodegradable
                                                                  poly-epsilon-caprolactone (PCL) for tissue engineering
            11.  Hasirci V, Hasirci N, 2018, Fundamentals of Biomaterials.   applications: A review. Rev Adv Mater Sci, 34: 123–140.
               Germany: Springer.
                                                               25.  Grandi C, di Liddo R, Paganin P,  et  al., 2011, Porous
            12.  Chen FM, Liu X, 2016, Advancing biomaterials of human   alginate/poly  (ε-caprolactone)  scaffolds:  Preparation,
               origin for tissue engineering. Prog Polym Sci, 53: 86–168.   characterization and  in vitro biological activity.  Int J Mol
               https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.004  Med, 27: 455–467.
            13.  O’Brien FJ, 2011, Biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue      https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2010.593
               engineering. Mater Today, 14: 88–95.            26.  Zhang XC, 2016, Science and Principles of Biodegradable and
               https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X      Bioresorbable Medical Polymers: Materials and Properties.
                                                                  Sawston, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing.
            14.  Keane  TJ,  Badylak  SF,  2014,  Biomaterials  for  tissue
               engineering applications. In: Seminars in Pediatric Surgery.   27.  Li W, Danielson KG, Alexander PG, et al., 2003, Biological
               Vol. 23. Netherlands: Elsevier. p112–118.          response  of  chondrocytes  cultured  in  three‐dimensional
                                                                  nanofibrous poly (ϵ‐caprolactone) scaffolds. J Biomed Mater
            15.  Burdick JA, Mauck RL, 2010, Biomaterials for Tissue   Res A, 67: 1105–1114.
               Engineering Applications: A Review of the Past and Future
               Trends. Germany: Springer.                         https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.10101
            16.  López‐Rodríguez N, López‐Arraiza A, Meaurio E,  et al.,   28.  Albertsson AC, Varma IK, 2003, Recent developments in
               2006, Crystallization, morphology, and mechanical behavior   ring opening polymerization of lactones for biomedical
               of polylactide/poly (ε‐caprolactone) blends. Polym Eng Sci,   applications. Biomacromolecules, 4: 1466–1486.
               46: 1299–1308.                                     https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034247a
               https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.20609               29.  Saudi S, Bhattarai SR, Adhikari U,  et al., 2020, Nanonet-
            17.  Yoshimoto H, Shin YM, Terai H, et al., 2003, A biodegradable   nano fiber electrospun mesh of PCL-chitosan for controlled
               nanofiber scaffold by electrospinning and its potential for   and extended release of diclofenac sodium.  Nanoscale,
               bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 24: 2077–2082.   12: 23556–23569.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00635-x      https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NR05968D
            18.  Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, et al., 2006, Biodegradable   30.  Adarkwa E, Kotoka R, Desai S, 2021, 3D printing of
               and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds   polymeric  Coatings  on  AZ31  Mg  alloy  Substrate  for
               for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 27: 3413–3431.   Corrosion Protection of biomedical implants. Med Devices
                                                                  Sens, 4: e10167.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1002/MDS3.10167
            19.  Ma PX, 2004, Scaffolds for tissue fabrication. Mater Today,   31.  Marquetti I, Desai S, 2018, Adsorption behavior of bone
               7: 30–40.
                                                                  morphogenetic protein-2 on a  graphite substrate for
               https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(04)00233-0      biomedical applications. Am J Eng Appl Sci, 11: 1037–1044.
            20.  Choi SW, Zhang Y, Xia Y, 2010, Three-dimensional scaffolds      https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2018.1037.1044
               for tissue engineering: The importance of uniformity in pore   32.  Wu F, Liu C, O’Neill B,  et al., 2012, Fabrication and
               size and structure. Langmuir, 26: 19001–19006.
                                                                  properties of porous scaffold of magnesium phosphate/
               https://doi.org/10.1021/la104206h                  polycaprolactone biocomposite for bone tissue engineering.


            Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023)                        549                         https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0196
   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562