Page 558 - IJB-9-6

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D printing of PCL-ceramic composite scaffolds

Appl Surf Sci, 258: 7589–7595. 43. Parupelli SK, Aljohani A, Desai S, 2019, Direct jet printing
and characterization of calcium alginate microcapsules for
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.04.094
biomedical applications. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IISE
33. Liu L, Wang Y, Guo S, et al., 2012, Porous polycaprolactone/ Annual Conference. Florida, USA: Institute of Industrial
nanohydroxyapatite tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated and Systems Engineers (IISE).
by combining NaCl and PEG as co-porogens: Structure,
property, and chondrocyte-scaffold interaction in vitro. 44. Perkins J, Xu Z, Smith C, et al., 2015, Direct writing of
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 100: 956–966. polymeric coatings on magnesium alloy for tracheal stent
applications. Ann Biomed Eng, 43: 1158–1165.
https://doi.org/10.1002/JBM.B.32658
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1169-3
34. Diba M, Kharaziha M, Fathi MH, et al., 2012, Preparation
and characterization of polycaprolactone/forsterite 45. Papaioannou TG, Manolesou D, Dimakakos E, et al., 2019,
nanocomposite porous scaffolds designed for bone tissue 3D bioprinting methods and techniques: Applications on
regeneration. Compos Sci Technol, 72: 716–723. artificial blood vessel fabrication. Acta Cardiol Sin, 35: 284.
https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.201905_35(3).20181115A
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2012.01.023
46. Ning L, Chen X, 2017, A brief review of extrusion-based
35. Lei B, Shin KH, Noh DY, et al., 2012, Bioactive glass
microspheres as reinforcement for improving the tissue scaffold bio-printing. Biotechnol J, 12: 1600671.
mechanical properties and biological performance of https://doi.org/10.1002/BIOT.201600671
poly(ε-caprolactone) polymer for bone tissue regeneration. 47. Deo KA, Singh KA, Peak CW, et al., 2020, Bioprinting
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 100B: 967–975.
101: Design, fabrication, and evaluation of cell-laden 3D
https://doi.org/10.1002/JBM.B.32659 bioprinted scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A, 26: 318–338.
36. Dong Z, Wu Y, Wang Q, et al., 2012, Reinforcement of https://doi.org/10.1089/TEN.TEA.2019.0298
electrospun membranes using nanoscale Al2O3 whiskers 48. Kačarević ŽP, Rider PM, Alkildani S, et al., 2018, An
for improved tissue scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A, introduction to 3D bioprinting: Possibilities, challenges and
100: 903–910.
future aspects. Materials, 11: 2199.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34027
https://doi.org/10.3390/MA11112199
37. Marquetti I, Desai S, 2019, Orientation effects on the nanoscale 49. Agarwal S, Saha S, Balla VK, et al., 2020, Current
adsorption behavior of bone morphogenetic protein-2 on developments in 3D bioprinting for tissue and organ
hydrophilic silicon dioxide. RSC Adv, 9: 906–916.
regeneration-a review. Front Mech Eng, 6: 589171.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA09165J
https://doi.org/10.3389/FMECH.2020.589171
38. Marquetti I, Desai S, 2018, Molecular modeling the adsorption 50. Gmeiner R, Deisinger U, Schönherr J, et al., 2015, Additive
behavior of bone morphogenetic protein-2 on hydrophobic manufacturing of bioactive glasses and silicate bioceramics.
and hydrophilic substrates. Chem Phys Lett, 706: 285–294.
J Ceram Sci, 6: 75–86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2018.06.015
https://doi.org/10.4416/JCST2015-00001
39. Marquetti I, Desai S, 2022, An atomistic investigation of 51. Sobral JM, Caridade SG, Sousa RA, et al., 2011, Three-
adsorption of bone morphogenetic protein-2 on gold with dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size
nanoscale topographies. Surfaces, 5: 176–185.
gradients: Effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical
https://doi.org/10.3390/surfaces5010010 performance and cell seeding efficiency. Acta Biomater,
7: 1009–1018.
40. Huang B, Caetano G, Vyas C, et al., 2018, Polymer-ceramic
composite scaffolds: The effect of hydroxyapatite and β-tri- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003
calcium phosphate. Materials, 11: 129.
52. Chen WH, Liu YY, Zhang FH, et al., 2015, Osteochondral
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010129 integrated scaffolds with gradient structure by 3D printing
forming. Int J Autom Comput, 12: 220–228.
41. Klein CP, Driessen AA, de Groot K, et al., 1983,
Biodegradation behavior of various calcium phosphate https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-014-0853-y
materials in bone tissue. J Biomed Mater Res, 17: 769–784.
53. Thomas M, Willerth SM, 2017, 3-D bioprinting of neural
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820170505 tissue for applications in cell therapy and drug screening.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 5: 69.
42. Parupelli S, Desai S, 2019, A comprehensive review of additive
manufacturing (3d printing): Processes, applications and https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2017.00069
future potential. Am J Appl Sci, 16: 244–272.
54. Kundu J, Shim JH, Jang J, et al., 2015, An additive
https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2019.244.272 manufacturing‐based PCL-alginate-chondrocyte bioprinted

Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 550 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0196