Page 415 - v11i4

International Journal of Bioprinting Bioprinted liver dECM/GelMA tumor model

27. Ferreira LP, Gaspar VM, Mano JF. Decellularized 38. Tao M, Ao T, Mao X, et al. Sterilization and disinfection methods
extracellular matrix for bioengineering physiomimetic for decellularized matrix materials: review, consideration and
3D in vitro tumor models. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38(12): proposal. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(9):2927-2945.
1397-1414. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.010
doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.04.006
39. Snyder Y, Jana S. Strategies for development of decellularized
28. García-Astrain C, Henriksen-Lacey M, Lenzi E, et al. heart valve scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials.
A scaffold-assisted 3D cancer cell model for surface- 2022;288:121675.
enhanced Raman scattering-based real-time sensing and doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121675
imaging. ACS Nano. 2024;18(17):11257-11269.
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c00543 40. Lian L, Xie M, Luo Z, et al. Rapid volumetric bioprinting
of decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks. Adv Mater.
29. Ebrahimighaei R, Tarassova N, Bond SC, et al. Extracellular 2024;36(34):2304846.
matrix stiffness controls cardiac fibroblast proliferation via doi: 10.1002/adma.202304846
the nuclear factor-Y (NF-Y) transcription factor. Biochim
Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2024;1871(2):119640. 41. Niu R, Xin Q, Xu E, Yao S, Chen M, Liu D. Nanostarch-
doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2023.119640 stimulated cell adhesion in 3D bioprinted hydrogel
scaffolds for cell cultured meat. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces.
30. Fu Y, Zhou Y, Wang K, Li Z, Kong W. Extracellular matrix 2024;16(18):23015-23026.
interactome in modulating vascular homeostasis and doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c03585
remodeling. Circ Res. 2024;134(7):931-949.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.324055 42. Bae M, Kim JJ, Kim J, Cho DW. Decellularized extracellular
matrix for three- dimensional bioprinted in vitro disease
31. Guo WY, Wang WH, Xu PY, Kankala RK. Decellularised modeling. Int J Bioprint. 2024;10(2):1970.
extracellular matrix-based injectable hydrogels for doi: 10.36922/ijb.1970
tissue engineering applications. Biomater Transl.
2024;5(2):114-128. 43. Shin M, Galarraga JH, Kwon MY, Lee H, Burdick JA. Gallol-
doi: 10.12336/biomatertransl.2024.02.003 derived ECM-mimetic adhesive bioinks exhibiting temporal
shear-thinning and stabilization behavior. Acta Biomater.
32. Naba A. Mechanisms of assembly and remodelling of the 2019;95:165-175.
extracellular matrix. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2024;25(11): doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.028
865-885.
doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00767-3 44. Ouyang L, Yao R, Zhao Y, Sun W. Effect of bioink properties
on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of
33. Zhou Z, Zhang Y, Zeng Y, et al. Effects of nanomaterials on embryonic stem cells. Biofabrication. 2016;8(3):035020.
synthesis and degradation of the extracellular matrix. ACS doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020
Nano. 2024;18(11):7688-7710.
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c09954 45. Brumberg VA, Bikmulina PY, Pozdnyakov AA, et al. Scaling
liver bioprinting: a guide for usage of the hepatic extracellular
34. Bhar B, Ranta P, Samudrala PK, Mandal BB. Omentum matrix as a bioink. Int J Bioprint. 2025;11(1):57-83.
extracellular matrix-silk fibroin hydroscaffold promotes doi: 10.36922/ijb.4343
wound healing through vascularization and tissue
remodeling in the diabetic rat model. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 46. Ouyang L, Yao R, Zhao Y, Sun W. Effect of bioink properties
2024;10(2):1090-1105. on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of
doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01877 embryonic stem cells. Biofabrication. 2016;8(3):035020.
doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020
35. Tam NW, Becker A, Mangiarotti A, Cipitria A, Dimova
R. Extracellular vesicle mobility in collagen I hydrogels 47. Choudhury D, Tun HW, Wang T, Naing MW. Organ-derived
is influenced by matrix-binding integrins. ACS Nano. decellularized extracellular matrix: a game changer for bioink
2024;18(43):29585-29601. manufacturing? Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36(8):787-805.
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c07186 doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.03.003
36. Puistola P, Kethiri A, Nurminen A, et al. Cornea-specific 48. Xu P, Kankala RK, Wang S, Chen A. Decellularized
human adipose stem cell-derived extracellular matrix extracellular matrix-based composite scaffolds for tissue
for corneal stroma tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater engineering and regenerative medicine. Regen Biomater.
Interfaces. 2024;16(13):15761-15772. 2023;11:rbad107.
doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c17803 doi: 10.1093/rb/rbad107
37. Na J, Yang Z, Shi Q, et al. Extracellular matrix stiffness 49. Khati V, Ramachandraiah H, Pati F, Svahn HA, Gaudenzi G,
as an energy metabolism regulator drives osteogenic Russom A. 3D bioprinting of multi-material decellularized
differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells. Bioact Mater. liver matrix hydrogel at physiological temperatures.
2024;35:549-563. Biosensors. 2022;12(7):521.
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.02.003 doi: 10.3390/bios12070521

Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025) 407 doi: 10.36922/IJB025160142