Page 171 - IJOCTA-15-2

J. Gunasekaran et.al / IJOCTA, Vol.15, No.2, pp.354-367 (2025)
Writing – review & editing: Radhakrishnan 15. Wang Y, Tan W, Cui W. Tuning of linear ac-
Thota Karunakaran tive disturbance rejection controllers for second-
order underdamped systems with time delay. ISA
Trans. 2021;118:83–93.
Availability of data 16. Yi H, Wang PH, Zhao G. Fractional order ac-
tive disturbance rejection control design for non-
Data can be provided by the authors upon re- integer order plus time delay models. Trans Inst
quest. Meas Control. 2023;45:1619–1633.
17. Nowak P, Czeczot J, Klopot T. Robust tuning of a
first order reduced Active Disturbance Rejection
Controller. Control Eng Pract 2018;74:44–57.
References
18. Skupin P, Nowak P, Czeczot J. On the stabil-
1. Han J. From PID to active disturbance rejection ity of active disturbance rejection control for
control. In: Transactions on Industrial Electron- first-order plus delay time processes. ISA Trans.
ics;2009:900–906. 2022;125:179–188.
2. Gao Z, Huang Y, Han J. An alternative para- 19. Xue W, Huang Y. Performance analysis of ac-
digm for control system design. Proceedings of tive disturbance rejection tracking control for
the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control a class of uncertain LTI systems. ISA Trans.
2001;5:4578–4585. 2015;58:133–154.
3. Ahi B, Haeri M. Linear Active Distur- 20. Zhang B, Tan W, Li J. Tuning of linear active
bance Rejection Control from the Practi- disturbance rejection controller with robustness
cal Aspects. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. specification. ISA Trans. 2019;85:237–246.
2018;23:2909–2919. 21. Przybyla M, Kordasz M, Madonski R, Herman
4. Herbst G. A simulative study on active distur- P, Sauer P. Active Disturbance Rejection Con-
bance rejection control (ADRC) as a control tool trol of a 2DOF manipulator with significant mod-
for practitioners. Electronics. 2013;2:246–279. eling uncertainty. Bull Pol Acad Sci Tech Sci.
5. Huang Y, Xue W. Active disturbance rejection 2012;60:509–520.
control: Methodology and theoretical analysis. 22. Mart´ınez BV, Sanchis J, Garc´ıa-Nieto S, Mart´ınez
ISA Trans. 2014;53:963–976. M. Tuning rules for active disturbance rejection
6. Song J, Su J, Hu Y, Zhao M, Gao K. Stability and controllers via multiobjective optimization—a
performance comparison analysis for linear ac- guide for parameters computation based on ro-
tive disturbance rejection control–based system. bustness. Mathematics. 2021;9:1–34.
Trans Inst Meas Control. 2022;44:2037–2048. 23. Srikanth MV, Yadaiah N. Analytical tuning rules
7. Fu C, Tan W. Tuning of linear ADRC with known for second-order reduced ADRC with SOPDT
plant information. ISA Trans. 2016;65:384–393. models. ISA Trans. 2022;131:693–714.
8. Jain S, Hote YV. Predictive generalised active dis- 24. Chen Z, Hao YS, Su Z gang, Sun L. Data-
turbance rejection for load frequency control with driven iterative tuning based active disturbance
communication delay. Trans Inst Meas Control. rejection control for FOPTD model. ISA Trans.
2023;45:2027–2042. 2022;128:593–605.
9. Zhao S, Gao Z. Modified active disturbance rejec- 25. Herbst G, Hempel AJ, G¨ohrt T, Streif S. Half-
tion control for time-delay systems. ISA Trans. gain tuning for active disturbance rejection con-
2014;53:882–888. trol. In: IFAC-PapersOnLine. Elsevier B.V.;
10. Zheng Q, Gao Z. Predictive active disturbance re- 2020: 1319–1324.
jection control for processes with time delay. ISA 26. Srikanth MV, Yadaiah N. Optimal parameter
Trans. 2014;53:873–881. tuning of Modified Active Disturbance Rejec-
11. Grelewicz P, Nowak P, Czeczot J, Musial J. In- tion Control for unstable time-delay systems us-
crement Count Method and Its PLC-Based Im- ing an AHP combined Multi-Objective Quasi-
plementation for Autotuning of Reduced-Order Oppositional Jaya Algorithm. Appl Soft Comput
ADRC with Smith Predictor. IEEE Trans Ind J. 2020.
Electron. 2021;68:12554–12564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105881
12. Sun L, Li D, Gao Z, Yang Z, Zhao S. Combined 27. He T, Wu Z, Li D, Wang J. A tuning method of
feedforward and model-assisted active distur- active disturbance rejection control for a class of
bance rejection control for non-minimum phase high-order processes. IEEE Trans Ind Electron.
system. ISA Trans. 2016;64:24–33. 2020;67:3191–3201.
13. Zhang B, Tan W, Li J. Tuning of Smith predic- 28. Gao Z. Scaling and Bandwidth-Parameterization
tor based generalized ADRC for time-delayed pro- Based Controller Tuning.
cesses via IMC. ISA Trans. 2020;99:159–166. 29. Astrom KJ, Hagglund T. PID Controllers: The-
14. Torrico BC, Pereira RDO, Sombra AKR, ory, Design, and Tuning, 2nd ed. ISA - The In-
Nogueira FG. Simplified filtered Smith predictor strumentation, Systems and Automation Society,
for high-order dead-time processes. ISA Trans. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA;
2021;109:11–21. 1995.
366