Page 78 - IJPS-11-6
P. 78

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                     The paradox of urban decline in India



















































                              Figure 4. Spatial pattern of growing, stabilizing, and declining urban centers in India, 1991–2001

            Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, etc., including 24 districts. In   centers with a low child-woman ratio (less than 200 and
            contrast,  low-low  clusters  indicating  the  concentration   200–250 account for 22.2% and 11.4% declining urban
            of declining urban centers in low-urbanized districts are   centers, respectively).
            mainly located in West Bengal, Jharkhand, Tamil Nadu,   The result further dictates that urban centers located
            Maharashtra, etc. (Figure 7).
                                                               closer to other urban centers with a population of more than
            3.4. Urban decline and city characteristics        100,000 experienced higher growth rates than those located
                                                               further away. However, there was no significant difference
            The bivariate analysis presents the growth pattern of urban   in terms of declining urban centers. Agglomeration setting
            centers in India based on their demographic and other   also influences the growth pattern. Among the urban
            local characteristics in 2011 (Table 3). The results highlight   centers that experienced population decline, about 14.2%
            that the civic status of cantonment boards and census   of them are part of urban agglomerations, while 10.6% are
            towns have the highest share of declining urban centers   not. Older urban centers formed before independence were
            at 48.3% and 17.5%, respectively. In contrast, Municipal   more likely to be in the growing and stabilizing stage, with
            corporations and municipalities show a lower prevalence   a small share of declining urban centers (8.7%). Contrarily,
            of declining urban centers (9%). The population density   among newly formed urban centers (1991–2001), the share
            was also an important factor in the urban decline. The   of declining urban centers was higher at 13.6%.
            share of declining urban centers has been found to be
            higher among less dense urban centers (13.2%) compared   The results further showed that change in boundary or
            to highly dense urban centers (7%). Furthermore, urban   reduction in area decline did not primarily affect population


            Volume 11 Issue 6 (2025)                        72                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.3107
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83