Page 80 - IJPS-11-6
P. 80

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                     The paradox of urban decline in India



















































                          Figure 6. Spatial pattern of shrinking cities in India (population declined during 1991–2001 and 2001–2011)

            3.6. Other local factors                           The study has carefully examined whether the decline
            Other local factors such as civic administrative status and   was the outcome of change in delineated boundary and
            distance from cities and area change status play significant   reduction area. The result shows that urban decline in
            roles in urban decline (Table 4). The results indicate that   India was not an outcome of the reduction in the area of
            urban centers with civic status, such as census towns and   urban centers as the odds of population decline were found
            cantonments, were more likely to experience population   to be significantly higher among the urban centers where
            decline among all urban centers, while municipalities were   the area has expanded for all urban centers. However, the
            less likely to experience the same. While only looking at the   condition was insignificant for cities.
            cities (4  model), municipal councils were more likely to   4. Discussion
                  th
            decline (3.085 times) compared to municipal corporations.
            Another important factor contributing to urban decline is   In this study, we uncovered the typical nature of urban
            the distance to the nearest class I city. It was observed that   growth in India. Many urban centers in India have passed
            urban centers located at a greater distance from the nearest   from a low growth rate to a high growth rate and again
            class I city were more likely to experience urban decline   devolved into the declining and shrinking stage. There
            than those that are nearer. However, it is not applicable for   was sluggish urban growth during the pre-independence
            class I cities. Furthermore, the result indicates that urban   era, but the post-independence era saw a surge in growth.
            centers in an agglomeration were more likely to experience   However, post-liberalization, the growth rate slowed
            population loss compared to independent urban centers.   down, and many urban centers started to shrink. The pre-



            Volume 11 Issue 6 (2025)                        74                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.3107
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85