Page 56 - JCTR-10-1
P. 56

Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2024; 10(1): 52-61




                                        Journal of Clinical and Translational Research

                                               Journal homepage: http://www.jctres.com/en/home


        ORIGINAL ARTICLE

        Effects of motor imagery and action observation on respiratory function in

        mild smokers: a randomized single-blind controlled pilot trial



        Ferran Cuenca-Martínez , Cristina Escudero-Pérez , Núria Sempere-Rubio *, Luis Suso-Martí *, Francisco M. Martínez-Arnau 1,2
                                                   1
                                                                                       1
                                                                       1
                             1
        1 Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain,  Frailty and Cognitive Impairment Research Group (FROG), University
                                                                2
        of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
        ARTICLE INFO                        ABSTRACT
        Article history:                    Background:  Motor  imagery (MI) and  action observation  (AO) training  can  activate  brain  areas
        Received: October 04, 2023          involved in planning, adjusting, and automating voluntary movement in a manner similar to that when
        Accepted: October 26, 2023          these activities are being performed.
        Published online: February 5, 2024  Aim: The main objective of this study was to assess the effects of MI and AO training on respiratory
                                            function in mild smokers.
        Keywords:                           Methods: A single-blind placebo-controlled pilot trial was designed. A total of 27 mild smokers were
        Motor imagery                       randomized into three groups: MI (n = 9), AO (n = 9), and sham observation (SO; n = 9) groups. The
        Action observation                  MI and AO groups performed mental training of breathing exercises while the SO group observed a
        Pulmonary function                  landscape without a human agent. The primary outcomes were pulmonary function parameters (forced
                                                                   st
        Respiratory parameters              expiratory volume during the 1  s [FEV ], forced vital capacity [FVC], FEV /FVC ratio, maximum
                                                                         1
                                                                                                    1
                                            voluntary ventilation [MVV], and peak expiratory flow [PEF]), and the secondary outcomes were
        *Corresponding author:              maximal inspiratory/expiratory pressures (MIP/MEP) and perceived fatigue. All outcome measures
        Núria Sempere-Rubio                 were assessed at baseline and post-intervention.
        Department of Physiotherapy, University of   Results:  Regarding  the  pulmonary  function  parameters,  only  the  AO  group  showed  significant
        Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.    within-group differences in FEV  (mean differences [MD] = 0.37 L (0.17 – 0.56), P = 0.001), FVC
                                                                    1
        Email: nuria.sempere@uv.es          (MD = 0.1 L (0.02 – 0.16), P = 0.008), and PEF (MD = 0.74 L/s (0.29 – 1.18), P = 0.002) with a
        Luis Suso-Martí                     small-to-moderate effect size. No differences were found in FEV /FVC ratio and MVV. With regard
                                                                                           1
        Department of Physiotherapy, University of   to the maximal static pressures, only the AO group showed significant within-group differences in
        Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain     MEP with a small effect size (MD = 11.22 cm H O (0.19 – 22.2), P = 0.046). Finally, both AO and
        Email: luis.suso@uv.es                                                  2
                                            MI groups showed significantly greater perceived fatigue with regard to SO group with a large effect
                                            size (P < 0.05).
        © 2024 Author(s). This is an Open-Access
        article distributed under the terms of the   Conclusion: AO training has a slight impact on some pulmonary function parameters, such as FEV ,
                                                                                                                    1
        Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial   FVC, or PEF, as well as on MEP when applied in isolation and in a single session.
        License, permitting all non-commercial use,   Relevance for Patients: Although it is still early to draw some solid conclusions, AO training could
        distribution, and reproduction in any medium,   be  used  in  combination with  respiratory  exercises  to  see  if  the  effect is  greater  than  exercises  in
        provided the original work is properly cited.  isolation. The study of movement representation strategies on pulmonary function is a field that has
                                            been sparingly explored so far. This paper offers some interesting data to be considered for further
                                            research.

                                            1. Introduction

                                              Motor imagery (MI) is defined as the creation and maintenance of a movement image
                                            without actually executing it [1]. In addition, action observation (AO) training is defined
                                            as the real-time visualization of a motion image without actually performing it [2]. Both
                                            neurosensory-motor training tools cause an activation of the cortical areas related to the
                                            planning, adjustment, and automation of voluntary movement that is qualitatively equal to,
                                                  DOI: http://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.00117
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61