Page 95 - JCTR-11-5
P. 95

Journal of Clinical and
            Translational Research                                                  ROCK inhibition in chronic rejection




             A                              B                  C                      D

















                                                               G                      H
            E                     F










                                                               J                        K
                                    I












                                       L                             M











            Figure 6. Effect of Rezurock and fingolimod treatment alone or in combination on fibrosis pathway-related protein expression in RAW 264.7 cells. (A,
            F-H, L) Western blot analysis of ROCK1, ROCK2, Notch1, PTX3, collagen Type I, CCL2, CCR2 and TGF-β1, respectively. GAPDH was used as a loading
            control. (B-E, I-K) Graphical representations of three independent western blot experiments corresponding to each protein.
            Notes: *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001.
            Abbreviations: CCL2: Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2; CCR2: C-C motif chemokine receptor 2; GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase;
            PTX3: Pentraxin 3; ROCK: Rho-associated coiled-coil kinase; TGF-β1: Transforming growth factor beta 1.


            infiltration into the allografts and reducing collagen   Our current research aimed to investigate changes
            deposition. 11,12  In line with our findings, other studies   in  gene  expression  patterns  in  macrophages  following
            have shown that pharmacological inhibition of ROCKs   combined treatment with the RhoA/ROCK inhibitors
            attenuates bleomycin- and radiation-induced pulmonary   Rezurock and fingolimod. We recently demonstrated that
            fibrosis by regulating macrophage polarization. 13  fingolimod, when administered alongside an early T-cell



            Volume 11 Issue 5 (2025)                        89                         doi: 10.36922/JCTR025270036
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100