Page 40 - MSAM-2-4

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing MAM for orthopedic bone plates: An overview

Acknowledgments 7. Li J, Qin L, Yang K, et al., 2020, Materials evolution of bone
plates for internal fixation of bone fractures: A review.
The authors would like to thank the China Scholarship J Mater Sci Technol, 36: 190–208.
Council (CSC) and the University of Bristol (UoB) for the
awarded CSC-UoB scholarship. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.024
8. Sheen JR, Mabrouk A, Garla VV, 2023, Fracture healing
Funding overview. In: StatPearls, Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls
Publishing.
None.
9. Ito H, 2011, Chemokines in mesenchymal stem cell therapy
Conflict of interest for bone repair: A novel concept of recruiting mesenchymal
stem cells and the possible cell sources. Mod Rheumatol,
The authors declare that they have no competing interests 21: 113–121.
Author contributions https://doi.org/10.1007/s10165-010-0357-8

Conceptualization: Fengyuan Liu, Weiting Xu 10. Pivonka P, Dunstan CR, 2012, Role of mathematical
Writing – original draft: Weiting Xu modeling in bone fracture healing. Bonekey Rep, 1: 221.
Writing – review & editing: Fengyuan Liu, Aydin Nassehi https://doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2012.221
Ethics approval and consent to participate 11. Duan ZW, Lu H, 2021, Effect of mechanical strain on cells
involved in fracture healing. Orthop Surg, 13: 369–375.
Not applicable. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12885
Consent for publication 12. Alias MA, Buenzli PR, 2018, Osteoblasts infill irregular pores
under curvature and porosity controls: A hypothesis-testing
Not applicable. analysis of cell behaviours. Biomech Model Mechanobiol,
17: 1357–1371.
Availability of data
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-018-1031-x
Not applicable.
13. Rajendran AK, Sankar D, Amirthalingam S, et al., 2023,
References Trends in mechanobiology guided tissue engineering and
tools to study cell-substrate interactions: A brief review.
1. Zhou J, Zhang Z, Joseph J, et al., 2021, Biomaterials and Biomater Res, 27: 55.
nanomedicine for bone regeneration: Progress and future
prospects. Exploration, 1: 20210011. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-023-00393-8
14. Zaheer MU, Mehboob H, Mehboob A, et al., 2022,
https://doi.org/10.1002/EXP.20210011
Evaluation of the effect of bone plate modulus on the early
2. Wildemann B, Ignatius A, Leung F, et al., 2021, Non-union bone healing of fractured tibia. Compos B Eng, 233: 109668.
bone fractures. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 7: 57.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109668
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-021-00289-8
15. Kim T, See CW, Li X, et al., 2020, Orthopedic implants and
3. Phillips AM, 2005, Overview of the fracture healing cascade. devices for bone fractures and defects: Past, present and
Injury, 36: S5–S7. perspective. Eng Regen, 1: 6–18.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.027 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2020.05.003
4. Ghiasi MS, Chen J, Vaziri A, et al., 2017, Bone fracture 16. Bartonícek J, 2010, Early history of operative treatment of
healing in mechanobiological modeling: A review of fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 130: 1385–1396.
principles and methods. Bone Rep, 6: 87–100.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1082-7
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2017.03.002
17. Lane WA, 1895, Some remarks on the treatment of fractures.
5. Salhotra A, Shah HN, Levi B, et al., 2020, Mechanisms Br Med J, 1: 861–863.
of bone development and repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 18. Bagby GW, Janes JM, 1958, The effect of compression on
21: 696–711.
the rate of fracture healing using a special plate. Am J Surg,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-00279-w 95: 761–771.
6. Bahney CS, Zondervan RL, Allison P, et al., 2019, Cellular https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(58)90625-1
biology of fracture healing. J Orthop Res, 37: 35–50.
19. Uhthoff HK, Poitras P, Backman DS, 2006, Internal plate
https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24170 fixation of fractures: Short history and recent developments.

Volume 2 Issue 4 (2023) 12 https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.2113